Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Read the following information for a question and chose the most appropriate option:
P and Q are good at driving the Motorcycle and Jeep. R and P are good at driving Jeep and Lorry. R, S, and T are good at driving Motor Cycle and Lorry. T and R are good at driving buses and Tempo. S and Q are good at driving Bus and Jeep.
Who is good at driving all the vehicles?
पर्याय
R
P
S
T
Advertisements
उत्तर
R
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Read the following information for a question and chose the most appropriate option:
P and Q are good at driving the Motorcycle and Jeep. R and P are good at driving Jeep and Lorry. R, S, and T are good at driving Motor Cycle and Lorry. T and R are good at driving buses and Tempo. S and Q are good at driving Bus and Jeep.
Who is good at driving Tempo, Motor Cycle, Lorry but not Jeep?
The words in the bottom row are related in the same way as the words in the top row. Fill in the blank.
Rose, Flower, Plant
Flat, House, ………….
If it is true that 'Religious fundamentalism is dangerous to the society', then which one of the following statements can also be true?
The question contains six statements followed by four sets of combinations of three. Choose the set, which gives the most logical triad. i.e. the third statement mentioned should be a conclusion drawn from the first two statements.
Statements:
- All frogs are amphibians.
- All amphibians are not frogs.
- AII amphibians are cold-blooded.
- AII frogs lay eggs.
- All amphibians lay eggs.
- Frogs are cold-blooded.
Choose the most appropriate option for the following question.
Crumb: Bread is as
Read the following information carefully and answer the question given below.
Seven film buffs -Aamna, Archana, Aradhana, Anu, Aahana, Anuja, and Aashna - attend a showing of classic movies. Three films are shown, one directed by Satyajit Ray, one by Stanley Kubrick, and one by Steven Spielberg. Each of the film buff see only one of the three films. The films are shown only once, one film at a time.
The following restrictions must apply:
- Exactly twice as many of the film buffs see the Stanley Kubrick film as the Satyajit Ray film.
- Aamna and Aahana do not see the same film as each other.
- Archana and Anu do not see the same film as each other.
- Anuja and Aashna see the same film as each other.
- Aradhana sees the Stanley Kubrick film.
- Aamna sees either the Satyajit Ray film or the Steven Spielberg film.
If exactly one film buff sees the Steven Spielberg film, then which one of the following must be true?
Mediators recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold mediator - client confidentiality, however, there are situations that may occur where the mediator is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the mediator is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the mediator is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client; however, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should there be a total ban on the use of plastic bags?
Arguments
- No. instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.
- Yes, the use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and waterlogging, and hence, it is necessary to ban it.
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and ill. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement
- Should there be a limit on drawing groundwater for irrigation purposes in India?
Arguments
- No, irrigation is of prime importance for food production in India and it is heavily dependent on groundwater in many parts of the country.
- Yes, water tables have gone down to alarmingly low levels in some parts of the country where irrigation is primarily dependent on groundwater, which may lead to serious environmental consequences.
- Yes, India just cannot afford to draw groundwater any further as the international agencies have cautioned India against it.
The question below is given a statement followed by three courses of action numbered I, II, and ill. A course of action is a step or administrative decision to be taken for improvement, follow-up, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the three given suggested courses of action logically follows worth pursuing. Then, decide which of the alternatives (a), (b), (c), or (d) is correct.
Statement The police have failed to protect the elderly citizens of society. Only last week three old persons were killed at three different places.
Courses of Action
I. The police should be asked to take special care of women and children.
II. The Government should bring legislation against the killing of elderly people.
III. Criminals who are accused of killing elderly people should be prosecuted by the state.
