मराठी

A Person Who Renounces Religious Or Political Belief Or Principle is Called:

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Choose the most appropriate option for each of the following questions.

A person who renounces religious or political belief or principle is called:

पर्याय

  • apostate

  • Antiquarian

  • Apostle

  • Ascetic

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

apostate

Explanation:

A person who renounces religious or political belief or principle is called apostate.

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2016-2017 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Rahul Dravid, the head coach of India’s Under-19 cricket team, explained that the 2018 Under-19 World Cup team selection strategy was about providing opportunities to a lot more players to come into the India Under-19 fold. He explained that more than winning — which is not the right touchstone of success of a program at this level — what matters is how many of the players are able to move to the next level, which is playing first-class cricket. He, therefore, made a conscious decision to not select players from the previous World Cup to the 2018 Under-19 World Cup squad. 

Which of the following is the most desirable outcome of Dravid’s selection strategy from his perspective? 


Solve the following question and mark the most appropriate option.
There were 200 students who gave a competitive exam. The exam had three sections English, Maths and General Knowledge(GK). Ten students could not pass in any of the subjects. Number of students passed in English was 125, Maths was 95 and general Knowledge was 95. 55 students passed in English and Mathematics. 45 students passed in GK and Maths and 60students passed in GK and English. 20 students passed in English and Maths but failed in GK.
How many passed in all three Subjects?


Carbon : Diamond :: Corundum : ?


Cloth : Mill :: Newspaper : ?


Given below is a passage followed by a statement about that passage. You must select one of the following answers:
Mediators recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold mediator - client confidentiality, however, there are situations that may occur where the mediator is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the mediator is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the mediator is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client; however, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.

Legitimate breaches of confidentiality relate to circumstances where the information the client has shared relates to anti-national activities; information of this nature must be reported. There are other circumstances where breaching confidentiality may be considered legitimate, for example, in the case of serious crime or suspected child abuse. Mediation service providers and mediators practicing independently have their own boundaries but must agree with this contractually with their client at the outset of the client - counsel relationship.

If a mediator breaches his client's confidence about a serious issue without first informing their client of their intentions, they are breaking the law.

Read the information carefully to answer the question.

Political turmoil in a country is mainly caused by widespread violence and flawed economic policies of successive governments. If at all this has to be crushed, it can be achieved only by a dictatorial government which rules with iron hand. Therefore, the need of the hour is to elect a government which imposes fresh set of stringent legislations. The alternatives suggested (not necessarily all), if true, considerably weaken the argument. However, one of them is most forceful. Identify the same.


In the question given below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement

  • Sealed tenders are invited from competent contractors experienced in executing construction jobs.

Conclusions

  1. Tenders are invited only from experienced contractors.
  2. It is difficult to find competent tenders in construction jobs.

In the question given below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement

  • The majority of Indian labourers belong to the unorganised sector and most of them earn very low.

Conclusions

  1. The labourers belonging to the organised sector have better benefits and stability.
  2. Some labourers belonging to the unorganised sector have a regular and certain income.

In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and ill. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement

  • Should there be a limit on drawing groundwater for irrigation purposes in India?

Arguments

  1. No, irrigation is of prime importance for food production in India and it is heavily dependent on groundwater in many parts of the country.
  2. Yes, water tables have gone down to alarmingly low levels in some parts of the country where irrigation is primarily dependent on groundwater, which may lead to serious environmental consequences.
  3. Yes, India just cannot afford to draw groundwater any further as the international agencies have cautioned India against it.

The question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. The course of action is a step for administrative decisions to be taken for improvement, follow-up, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the given suggested courses of action is/are logically worth pursuing.

Statement Despite the good economic progress of the country, the significant number of under-nourished cb.ildren has been observed in the rural parts of the country.

Courses of Action

I. The government should increase the Wealth Tax/ Income Tax and use that money for the upliftment of the deprived class.
II. The government should introduce schemes like free meals in primary schools and make primary education compulsory.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×