हिंदी

A Person Who Renounces Religious Or Political Belief Or Principle is Called:

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Choose the most appropriate option for each of the following questions.

A person who renounces religious or political belief or principle is called:

विकल्प

  • apostate

  • Antiquarian

  • Apostle

  • Ascetic

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

apostate

Explanation:

A person who renounces religious or political belief or principle is called apostate.

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2016-2017 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्न

Read the following information for a question and chose the most appropriate option: 

P and Q are good at driving the Motorcycle and Jeep. R and P are good in driving Jeep and Lorry. R, S, and T are good at driving Motor Cycle and Lorry. T and R are good at driving buses and Tempo. S and Q are good at driving Bus and Jeep. 

Who is good at driving the motor Cycle, Jeep and Lorry but not a bus? 


All men are chairs. John Doe is a man. In logical language, therefore: 


Which word in the following group DOES NOT belong to the others?

PROSPER, EXCITE, THRIVE, FLOURISH


The question contains six statements followed by four sets of combinations of three. Choose the set, which gives the most logical triad. i.e. the third statement mentioned should be a conclusion drawn from the first two statements.

Statements:

  1. All mangoes are fruits.
  2. All mangoes are green.
  3. All mangoes are oval-shaped.
  4. All fruits are sweet.
  5. All mangoes are sweet.
  6. All fruits are expensive.

Choose the most appropriate option for the following question.

Crumb: Bread is as


In the following questions find which one word cannot be formed from the letters of the given words using each letter only once:

ORGANISATION


Given below is a passage followed by a statement about that passage. You must select one of the following answers:
Mediators recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold mediator - client confidentiality, however, there are situations that may occur where the mediator is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the mediator is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the mediator is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client; however, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.
Legitimate breaches of confidentiality relate to circumstances where the information the client has shared relates to anti-national activities; information of this nature must be reported. There are other circumstances where breaching confidentiality may be considered legitimate, for example, in the case of serious crime or suspected child abuse. Mediation service providers and mediators practicing independently have their own boundaries but must agree with this contractually with their client at the outset of the client - counsel relationship.
Being obliged to break confidentiality in a mediator - client relationship is always a direct result of the law.

Read the information carefully to answer the question.

Political turmoil in a country is mainly caused by widespread violence and flawed economic policies of successive governments. If at all this has to be crushed, it can be achieved only by a dictatorial government which rules with iron hand. Therefore, the need of the hour is to elect a government which imposes fresh set of stringent legislations. The alternatives suggested (not necessarily all), if true, considerably weaken the argument. However, one of them is most forceful. Identify the same.


In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement Should there be a limit on drawing groundwater for irrigation purposes in India?

Arguments

  1. No, irrigation is of prime importance for food production in India and it is heavily dependent on groundwater in many parts of the country.
  2. Yes, water tables have gone down to alarmingly low levels in some parts of the country where irrigation is primarily dependent on groundwater, which may lead to serious environmental consequences.
  3. Yes, India just cannot afford to draw groundwater any further as the international agencies have cautioned India against it.

The following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and IIIYou have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements

Statements

  1. Water has a shape, has volume.
  2. The knowledge is like water, flowing from one side to another.

Conclusions

  1. Knowledge is interdisciplinary.
  2. The knowledge is bound within a specific area.
  3. Knowledge influences the core of mental activity directly.

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×