मराठी

UG-CLAT entrance exam Important Questions

Advertisements
[object Object]
[object Object]
विषय
मुख्य विषय
अध्याय

Please select a subject first

Advertisements
Advertisements
< prev  561 to 580 of 963  next > 

Principle: Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under twelve years of age, who has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequences of his conduct on that occasion.

Facts: Himesh, 11 years old boy, picks up a gold ring worth Rs 5000/-­ lying on a table in his friend's house and immediately sells it for Rs 2000/­, and misappropriates the money.

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Law of Torts (Entrance Exams)

Principle:
1. Wagering agreements are void.
2. Collateral agreements to wagering contracts are valid.

Facts: XYZ Bank lends Rs. 40, 000 to Sabu in order to enable him to award as a prize to Randeep who is the winner of horse race. Later Sabu refuses to pay the prize stating that horse racing is wagering agreement. Can XYZ Bank recover money from Sabu?

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Law of Torts (Entrance Exams)

Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wrongful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law, to the person who suffers from such acts.

Facts: 'Prakash' has a rice mill. His neighbor, Shanti, sets up another rice mill and offers a tough competition to Prakash. As a consequence, Prakash's profits fall down. He brings a suit against Shanti for damages.

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Law of Torts (Entrance Exams)

Principle: Consent is a good defence for civil action in tort. But consent must include both knowledge of risk and assumption of risk, i.e, readiness to bear harm.

Facts: A lady passenger was aware that the driver of the cab, in which she opted to travel was little intoxicated. The cab met with an accident and lady got injured.

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Law of Torts (Entrance Exams)

Principle: Law does not penalise for wrongs which are of trivial nature.

Facts: In the course of a discussion, 'A' threw a file of papers at the table which touched the hands of 'B'.

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Law of Torts (Entrance Exams)

Under the Constitution of India 'Right to Pollution Free Environment' has emerged as a fundamental right from the right to­-

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Indian Constitution (Entrance Exams)

Choose the most appropriate option:

'alibi' means a plea by an accused person that he

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Choose the most appropriate option:

'obiter dicta' means-

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

If an authority is holding information about another in a 'fiduciary capacity', the information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 may not be obtainable. 'Fiduciary relationship' is based on:

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Indian Constitution (Entrance Exams)

Under the Constitution of India restriction on freedom of religion cannot be placed on the ground of­

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Indian Constitution (Entrance Exams)

Choose the most appropriate option:

As per law the minimum age for the marriage of a boy and a girl in India is­-

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Indian Contract Act (Entrance Exams)

Choose the most appropriate option:

Which among the following was described by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar as the "heart and soul of the Constitution of India"?

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Indian Constitution (Entrance Exams)

Choose the most appropriate option:

The Supreme Court of India has struck down the Constitution (Ninety-ninth Amendment) Act, 2014 as unconstitutional. It is related to­

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Indian Constitution (Entrance Exams)

Choose the most appropriate option:

Which one of the following is not a Directive Principle of State Policy under Part IV of the Constitution of India?

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Indian Constitution (Entrance Exams)

Choose the most appropriate option:

'persona non grata' means-

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

Choose the most appropriate option:

The object of which one of the following writs is to prevent a person to hold public office which he is not legally entitled to hold?

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Legal Fundamentals and Terms (Entrance Exams)

Choose the most appropriate option:

Which Indian State has prescribed minimum educational qualification for candidates contesting panchayat polls?

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Legal Fundamentals and Terms (Entrance Exams)

Choose the most appropriate option:

Which among the following does not belong to the 'right to freedom of religion'?

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Indian Constitution (Entrance Exams)

Choose the most appropriate option:

'Audi alteram partem' means

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Study of Law (Entrance Exams)

This question consists of principles and facts. The principal may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the question, you must not rely on any principle except the principle that is given hereinbelow for the question.  
Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest in the study of law, research aptitude, and problem-solving ability. 
Therefore, to answer a question, the principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option.

Principle: According to law, a person is deemed to have attained the age of majority when he completes the age of 18 years, except in the case of a person where a guardian of a minor’s person or property has been appointed under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 or where the superintendence of a minor’s property is assumed by a Court of Wards. Indian law expressly forbids a minor from entering into a contract. Hence, any contract entered into by a minor is void­ab­initio regardless of whether the other party was aware of his minority or not. Further, though a minor is not competent to contract, nothing in the Contract Act prevents him from making the other party bound to the minor.

Facts: Lal executed a promissory note in favour of Gurudutt, aged 16 years stating that he would pay Gurudutt a sum of Rs. 2 Lakhs when he attains the age of majority. On attaining the age of 18, Gurudutt demanded the amount from Lal, who refused to pay. Gurudutt wants to take legal action against Lal. Identify the most appropriate legal position from the following:

Appears in 1 question paper
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: Indian Contract Act (Entrance Exams)
< prev  561 to 580 of 963  next > 
Advertisements
Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×