मराठी

If an Authority is Holding Information About Another in a 'Fiduciary Capacity', the Information Under the Right to Information Act, 2005 May Not Be Obtainable. 'Fiduciary Relationship' is Based On:

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

If an authority is holding information about another in a 'fiduciary capacity', the information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 may not be obtainable. 'Fiduciary relationship' is based on:

पर्याय

  • Authority

  • Trust

  • Law

  • Contract

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

Trust

shaalaa.com
Indian Constitution (Entrance Exams)
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2015-2016 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Mark the best option:
Which article defines Protection in respect of conviction for offenses?


Mark the best option:
Which part of the Constitution defines Fundamental Rights?


Mark the best option:
Principles: Nothing is an offense which is done by a child under seven years of age.
Facts: A, a child born on January 01, 2005, killed another child B on December 30, 2011.


The cardinal features of the political system in India are 

  1.  It is a democratic republic. 
  2. It has a parliamentary form of government.
  3. The Supreme power vests in the people of India.

Select the correct answer using the codes given below.


In United States, the residuary power lies with ______________.


Separation of the judiciary from the executive has been provided in one of the following parts of the Indian Constitution.


How many seats reserved for SCs and STs in Rajya Sabha?


The High Court of a State is under the direct supervision of


In the question given below are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R). In the context of the two statements, which of the following is correct? 
Assertion (A): Power for conducting elections to the Parliament and State Legislature in a free and fair manner have been given to an independent body called Election Commissioner.
Reason (R): Power of removal of Election Commissioners is with Executive.


On April 2013, the Supreme Court held that the modification of a well-known cancer-fighting drug is not a patentable new invention against which pharmaceutical firm?


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×