मराठी

Under the Constitution of India Restriction on Freedom of Religion Cannot Be Placed on the Ground Of­

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Under the Constitution of India restriction on freedom of religion cannot be placed on the ground of­

पर्याय

  • Morality

  • Social justice

  • Health

  • Public order

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

Social justice

Explanation:

Article 25 of the constitution of India states restrictions on freedom of religion be place on the ground on public order, morality, and health. There is no ground for social justice.   

shaalaa.com
Indian Constitution (Entrance Exams)
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2015-2016 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

One of the reasons for recusal of a Judge is that litigants/the public might entertain a reasonable apprehension about his impartiality. As Lord Chief Justice Hewart said: "It is not merely of some importance but is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done." And therefore, in order to uphold the credibility of the integrity institution, Judge recuses from hearing the case. A Judge of the Supreme Court or the High Court, while assuming Office, takes an oath as prescribed under Schedule III to the Constitution of India, that: "… I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established, that I will uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India, that I will duly and faithfully and to the best of my ability, knowledge and judgment perform the duties of my office without fear or favour, affection or ill-will and that I will uphold the Constitution and the laws." Called upon to discharge the duties of the Office without fear or favour, affection or ill-will, it is only desirable, if not proper, that a Judge, for any unavoidable reason like some pecuniary interest, affinity or adversity with the parties in the case, direct or indirect interest in the outcome of the litigation, family directly involved in litigation on the same issue elsewhere, the Judge being aware that he or someone in his immediate family has an interest, financial or otherwise that could have a substantial bearing as a consequence of the decision in the litigation, etc., to recuse himself from the adjudication of a particular matter. No doubt, these examples are not exhaustive. The simple question is, whether the adjudication by the Judge concerned, would cause reasonable doubt in the mind of a reasonably informed litigant and the fair-minded public as to his impartiality. Being an institution whose hallmark is transparency, it is only proper that the Judge discharging high and noble duties, at least broadly indicate the reasons for recusing from the case so that the litigants or the well-meaning public may not entertain any misunderstanding. Once the reasons for recusal are indicated, there will not be any room for attributing any motive for the recusal. To put it differently, it is part of his duty to be accountable to the Constitution by upholding it without fear or favour, affection or ill- will. Therefore, I am of the view that it is the constitutional duty, as reflected in one's oath, to be transparent and accountable, and hence, a Judge is required to indicate reasons for his recusal from a particular case.

What kind of institution the judiciary is referred to in the passage?


Mark the best option:
The maximum duration for which the Vice-President may officiate as the President of India is


The Lok Sabha passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriages) Bill 2017. Which of the following are true about it?

  1. It declares instant triple talaq illegal and criminalizes it.
  2. It makes a declaration of talaq a bailable offense.
  3. A husband declaring talaq can be imprisoned for up to two years along with a fine.
  4. It entitles Muslim women against whom triple talaq has been declared to seek subsistence allowance from her husband for herself and for her dependent children.

Under which Government of India Act, Federation, and Provincial Autonomy were introduced in India? 


In the question given below are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R). In the context of the two statements, which of the following is correct?
Assertion (A): The first linguistic state known as Andhra State was formed by separating the Telugu speaking areas from the Madras State.
Reason (R): A prolonged agitation and death of Potti Sriramulu after a 56-day hunger strike for the cause.


Find the odd out


To secure just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief is enumerated in which of the following Articles?


Who is the crisis manager-in-chief at the political level during emergencies?


A change is the distribution of powers between the centre and the states can be done by


Which of the following amendments are sought to be introduced in the Representation of the People Act through Amendment Bill, 2018?

I. Proxy voting
II. Gender-neutral provisions
III. Allocation of seats
IV. Delimitation of constituencies


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×