मराठी

There Were Twelve Dozens of Chocolates with a Shopkeeper. Ten Chocolates Were Distributed by the Shopkeeper to the Children of His Colony.

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Choose the most appropriate option for the following question.

There were twelve dozens of chocolates with a shopkeeper. Ten chocolates were distributed by the shopkeeper to the children of his colony. The shopkeeper then added two more dozens of chocolates in his stock. If the shopkeeper divided the total chocolates equally in two different packets, then how many chocolates were there in each packet?

पर्याय

  • 152

  • 89

  • 158

  • 79

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

79

Explanation:

Total chocolates before distributing to children = 12 × 12 = 144

10 chocolates were given to children, then number of chocolates left = 144 - 10 = 134

However, two more dozens of chocolates were added, then chocolates = 134 + 24 = 158

Number of chocolates per packet = `158/2 = 79`

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2016-2017 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

The following question has two statements P and Q. They may look factually absurd. You have to ignore this absurdly and concentrate only upon the logic involved in its statement.
Mark the answer as
 P:  Some musicians are not rich. All musicians are polite. Therefore not all polite persons are rich. 
Q:  All musicians are rich. No rich person is polite. Therefore musicians are not polite. 


Read the following information for a question and chose the most appropriate option: 

P and Q are good at driving the Motorcycle and Jeep. R and P are good in driving Jeep and Lorry. R, S, and T are good at driving Motor Cycle and Lorry. T and R are good at driving buses and Tempo. S and Q are good at driving Bus and Jeep. 

Who is good at driving the motor Cycle, Jeep and Lorry but not a bus? 


Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H want to have dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements. 

(a) A will sit beside C.
(b) H will sit beside A.
(c) C will sit beside E.
(d) F will sit beside H.
(e) E will sit beside G.      
(f) D will sit beside F.
(g) G will sit beside B.
(h) B will sit beside D. 

A and F will become neighbours if: 


Instructions for Question: Choose the set of three statements where the third statement can be logically derived from the preceding two. 

Statements:

1. All boys need books.
2. All the girls need books.
3. Punjabis are a girl.
4. Some Punjabis need the book.
5. All the boys are girls.
6. Some boys are Punjabis.

The set of statements is:


Read the following short passage and choose the best answer to the question below that passage.
Modern science is built on the process of posing hypotheses and testing them against observations -in essence, attempting to show that the hypotheses are incorrect. Nothing brings more recognition than overthrowing conventional wisdom. It is accordingly not surprising that some scientists are skeptical of the widely accepted predictions of global warming. What is instead remarkable is that with hundreds of researchers striving to make breakthroughs in climatology, very few find evidence that global warming is unlikely.
The information above provides the most support for which one of the following statements? 


Read the following short passage and choose the best answer to the question above that passage.
Cate's Coffee Emporium stocks only two decaffeinated coffees: English Roast and German Mocha. Ratan only serves decaffeinated coffee, and the coffee he served after dinner last night was far too smooth and mellow to have been English Roast. So, if Ratan still gets all his coffee from Cafe's, what he served last night was German Mocha.
The argument above is most similar in its logical structure to which one of the following?


In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by four arguments numbered I, II, Ill, and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.

Statement

  • Should people with educational qualifications higher than the optimum requirements be debarred from seeking jobs?

Arguments

  1. No, it will further aggravate the problem of educated unemployment.
  2. Yes, it creates complexes among employees and affects the work adversely.
  3. No, this goes against the basic rights of the individuals.
  4. Yes, this will increase productivity.

Vijay claimed that the large dent in the fender of the company-owned vehicle he had borrowed was caused by the careless actions of another motorist, who backed into the car when it was parked in a public garage. Yet Vijay's own car has several dents in its fenders, all of which he acknowledges as having caused by his own careless driving. Therefore, Vijay's contention that the dent in the formerly undented company-owned vehicle was caused by the careless actions of another person is not true.

The reasoning in this argument is vulnerable because of it


The question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement.

Statement As poor people in India prefer and use jaggery rather than sugar, the government has decided to decontrol and scrap sugar distribution through the Public Distribution System (PDS).

Assumptions

  1. Jaggery is freely available at a reasonable price to all poor people.
  2. PDS has lost its utility.

The question below is given a statement followed by three courses of action numbered I, II, and ill. A course of action is a step or administrative decision to be taken for improvement, follow-up, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the three given suggested courses of action logically follows worth pursuing. Then, decide which of the alternatives (a), (b), (c), or (d) is correct.

Statement Any further increase in pollution level in the city, by way of industrial effluent and automobile exhaustion, would pose a severe threat to the inhabitants.

Courses of Action

I. All the factories in the city should be immediately closed down.
II. The automobiles should not be allowed to play on the road for more than four hours a day.
III. The Government should restrict the issue of fresh licenses to factories and automobiles.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×