Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Find the odd-man-out:
पर्याय
http://www.scholar.google.com
http://www.manupatra.com
http://www.lexisnexis.com
http://www.westlawindia.com
Advertisements
उत्तर
http://www.scholar.google.com
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Instructions for Question:
The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.
Main statement: Only if the teaching standard is destroyed, will the examination result be poor.
1. The examination result is poor.
2. The teaching standard is not destroyed.
3. Examination result is not poor.
4. The teaching standard is destroyed.
The ordered pair of statements is:
Answer the question based on the information given.
"Some men are certainly intelligent, others are certainly not intelligent, but of intermediate men, we should say, 'intelligent'? Yes, I think, so or no, I shouldn't be inclined to call him intelligent."
Which of the following most accurately reflects the intention of the writer of the above?
The question contains six statements followed by four sets of combinations of three. Choose the set, which gives the most logical triad. i.e. the third statement mentioned should be a conclusion drawn from the first two statements.
Statements:
- All mangoes are fruits.
- All mangoes are green.
- All mangoes are oval-shaped.
- All fruits are sweet.
- All mangoes are sweet.
- All fruits are expensive.
Find the odd one out
In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement Should the salary and perquisites of the public sector undertaking employees be made equivalent to those in the private sector?
Arguments
- Yes, this will help the public sector undertaking to attract and retain a competent workforce.
- No, public sector undertakings cannot afford to pay salaries to the level of the private sector.
- Yes, otherwise the public sector undertakings will not be able to compete with the private sector organisations.
In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by four arguments numbered I, II, III, and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should all the management institutes in the country be brought under government control?
Arguments
- No, the government does not have adequate resources to run such institutes effectively.
- No, each institute should be given the freedom to function on its own.
- Yes, this will enable to have standarised education for all the students.
- Yes, only then the quality of education would be improved.
The following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and III. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements
Statements
- Science has brought gadgets of happiness, prosperity, and wealth.
- Science has not solved the problems of overpopulation.
Conclusions
- Overpopulation is due to unscientific thinking.
- Science has not helped world peace.
The following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and III.
You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements
Statements
- Most of the 64 number of buses go to my office.
- This is the 64 number bus.
Conclusions
- This bus goes to my office.
- This bus does not go to my office.
In the following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and m. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements.
Statements
- Most of the 64 number of buses go to my office.
- This is the 64 number bus.
Conclusions
- This bus goes to my office.
- This bus does not go to my office.
The question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. The course of action is a step for administrative decisions to be taken for improvement, follow-up, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the given suggested courses of action is/are logically worth pursuing.
Statement The expert's group on technical education has stressed that computer education should be provided to children from the primary school itself. It should be implemented in urban and rural schools, simultaneously.
Courses of Action
I. The government should issue instructions to all schools for computer education.
II. At least one teacher from each school should be trained in computer operations for teaching children.
