हिंदी

Without using truth tabic show that ~(p v q)v(~p ∧ q) = ~p

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Without using truth tabic show that ~(p v q)v(~p ∧ q) = ~p

Advertisements

उत्तर

~(p v q)v(~p ∧ q)

≡~(p v q)v~(p ∨ ~q)                      by De Morgan's Law

≡~[(p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ~q)]                    by De Morgan's Law

≡~{[(p ∨ q) ∧ p] ∨ [(p ∨ q)∧ ~q)]}   by Distributive Law

≡ ~{[p] ∨ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ~q]}               by  Absorption Law

≡ ~{[p] ∨ [(p∧ ~q) ∨ (q ∧ ~q)]}      by Distributive Law

≡~{[p] ∨ [(p ∧ ~q) ∨ F]}                by Complement Law

≡~{[p] ∨ [(p ∧ ~q)]}                     by Identity Law

≡~p ∧ (~p ∨ q)                             by De Morgan's Law

≡ ~p                                           by Absorption Law

shaalaa.com
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2015-2016 (March)

APPEARS IN

संबंधित प्रश्न

The negation of p ∧ (q → r) is ______________.


Without using the truth table show that P ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q)


If A = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, then which of the following is not true?

(A) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 3 = 8

(B) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 5

(C) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 9

(D) ∀ x ∈ A such that x + 6 ≥ 9


Using the rules of negation, write the negatlon of the following: 

(a) p ∧ (q → r)

(b)  ~P ∨ ~q


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

It f(2) = 0 then f(x) is divisible by (x – 2).


Without using truth table prove that:

∼ [(p ∨ ∼ q) → (p ∧ ∼ q)] ≡ (p ∨ ∼ q) ∧ (∼ p ∨ q)


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ ∼r)


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

p ∧ (q ∨ r)


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p → q) ∧ r


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼q)


Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.


Using the algebra of statement, prove that

(p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ≡ (p ∨ ~ q)


For any two statements p and q, the negation of the expression (p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼p is ______ 


(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______ 


The logically equivalent statement of (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) is ______ 


The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______ 


(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is a ______.


The negation of the Boolean expression (r ∧ ∼s) ∨ s is equivalent to: ______ 


Without using truth table prove that (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) v (p∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q


If p ∨ q is true, then the truth value of ∼ p ∧ ∼ q is ______.


Negation of the Boolean expression `p Leftrightarrow (q \implies p)` is ______. 


Without using truth table, prove that : [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] →q is a tautology.


The statement p → (q → p) is equivalent to ______.


Show that the simplified form of (p ∧ q ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (r ∧ p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∨ q) is q ∨ ∼ p.


The logically equivalent statement of \[\left(\sim p\wedge q\right)\vee\left(\sim p\wedge\sim q\right)\] \[\vee\left(\ p\wedge\sim q\right)\] is


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×