Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Who among the following was the first Chairman of the Constituent Assembly in India?
विकल्प
Dr. Rajendra Prasad
Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha
Harendra Coomar Mookerjee
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
Advertisements
उत्तर
Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha
The first chairman of the constituent assembly in India was an option 'Dr. Sachchidanand Sinha'. Dr. Rajendra Prasad was the first president of independent India. Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha was the first chairman (temporary) of the Constituent Assembly. Harender Coomer Mookerjee was the Vice-President of the Constituent Assembly of India for drafting the Constitution of India. DR.B.R.Ambedkar was the Chairman of the Constitution Drafting Committee and was appointed by the Assembly to write India's new Constitution.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Mark the best option:
The Vice-President may be removed from his office by
The principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option:
Principle: The Constitution of India guarantees certain fundamental rights to its citizens. The Constitution also provides that these rights cannot be taken away by state even by law. For violation of this, the person adversely affected by the law may approach the High Court or the Supreme Court for the issuance of an appropriate writ. One of these rights includes the freedom to form association that implies the right to join an association or not to joins such an association.
Facts: Owing to some industrial disturbances created by XATU, one of the several trade unions in AB Chemicals (Pvt) Ltd., the Company issued a circular to all its employees that as far as possible the employees may disassociate with XATU. Navin is an employee of AB Chemicals and the current General Secretary of XATU. Aggrieved by this circular, which affected the fundamental rights of his and other members of the Union, approaches the High Court of the state for relief. Identify the most reasonable legal proposition.
Given below is the statement of Legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
LEGAL PRINCIPLE: A power conferred by a statute cannot be withdrawn by subordinate legislation.
FACTUAL SITUATION: The Cinematograph Act conferred powers upon the District Magistrate (DM) to grant license subject to the control of the government. The government framed Rules under the said Act. The effect of these Rules was that the licensing power stood transferred to the Government itself and the District Magistrate was rendered powerless. Whether such Rules are valid?
DECISION :
Which of the following person is eligible for the citizen of India by descent?
Which of the following Article lays down no religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of state funds?
Under which of the following Article the Governor can reserve a Bill for the President's Constitution?
The 39th Constitutional Amendment laid that election of any person to Lok Sabha holding the office of Prime Minister cannot be challenged before a Court of Law, but only before an authority established by Parliament. This was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in
Which officer of the Government of India has the right to take part in the proceeding of Parliament of India even though he is not a member?
Answer the question which follows from the application of the under mentioned legal principle.
Principle: The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion and expects the citizen to respect national anthem as a fundamental duty.
Facts: According to the religion's tenets of a particular sect, singing the praise of any entity other than God is forbidden. The child, belonging to that sect, refuses to sing national anthem in the course of school assembly, in which every child must compulsorily participate. When the disciplinary action was instituted against the child, the parents challenged the school' s order of singing the national anthem.
On April 2013, the Supreme Court held that the modification of a well-known cancer-fighting drug is not a patentable new invention against which pharmaceutical firm?
