Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
The principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option:
Principle: The Constitution of India guarantees certain fundamental rights to its citizens. The Constitution also provides that these rights cannot be taken away by state even by law. For violation of this, the person adversely affected by the law may approach the High Court or the Supreme Court for the issuance of an appropriate writ. One of these rights includes the freedom to form association that implies the right to join an association or not to joins such an association.
Facts: Owing to some industrial disturbances created by XATU, one of the several trade unions in AB Chemicals (Pvt) Ltd., the Company issued a circular to all its employees that as far as possible the employees may disassociate with XATU. Navin is an employee of AB Chemicals and the current General Secretary of XATU. Aggrieved by this circular, which affected the fundamental rights of his and other members of the Union, approaches the High Court of the state for relief. Identify the most reasonable legal proposition.
विकल्प
Circular issued by a Company amounts to law in the constitutional sense and hence the High Court can issue a writ as pleaded for by Navin.
The circular interferes with the freedom guaranteed by the Constitution and hence the High Court can issue an appropriate writ.
The prohibition against any imposition of restriction against a fundamental right is not applicable to anybody other than the state and hence Navin will not get any relief from the High Court.
The Company’s circular is illegal and has to be quashed by the Court.
Advertisements
उत्तर
The prohibition against any imposition of restriction against a fundamental right is not applicable to anybody other than the state and hence Navin will not get any relief from the High Court.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Mark the best option:
Who presided over a joint sitting of the lower and upper house of the Parliament?
The speaker can ask a member of the house to stop speaking and let another member speak. This is known as?
Which of the following rights has declared as a part of Article 21 by the Supreme Court?
- Right to livelihood
- Right to shelter
- Right to health
- Right to free legal aid
Select the correct answer using the codes given below.
Which of the following Articles contain the Directive Principles of State Policy?
What is the tenure of a Judge of the Supreme Court?
In the question given below are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R). In the context of the two statements, which of the following is correct?
Assertion (A): The Indian Constitution recognises the supremacy of the judiciary.
Reason (R): The question as to what constitutes a reasonable restriction on Fundamental Rights is to be determined by the Court of Law.
The Concept of Public Interest Litigation originated in
Which part of the Constitution of India contains Article 370?
Who among the following conferred with the special responsibility law and order in the state of Arunachal Pradesh?
Principle: Whenever there is an invasion of a legal right, the person in whom the right is vested, is entitled to bring an action though he has suffered no actual loss or harm and may recover damages (compensation).
Facts: 'A’ was a qualified voter for the Lok Sabha election. However, a returning officer wrongfully refused to take A's vote. Inspite of such wrongful refusal, the candidate, for whom 'A' wanted to vote, won the election. But, 'A' brought an action for damages. Which of the following derivations is correct?
