Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Read the following statements which are taken as axioms:
- If a transversal intersects two parallel lines, then corresponding angles are not necessarily equal.
- If a transversal intersect two parallel lines, then alternate interior angles are equal.
Is this system of axioms consistent? Justify your answer.
Advertisements
उत्तर
A system of axiom is called consistent, if there is no statement which can be deduced from these axioms such that it contradicts any axiom. We know that, if a transversal intersects two parallel lines, then each pair of corresponding angles are equal, which is a theorem. So, Statement I is false and not an axiom.
Also, we know that, if a transversal intersects two parallel lines, then each pair of alternate interior angles are equal. It is also a theorem. So, Statement II is true and an axiom.
Thus, in given statements, first is false and second is an axiom.
Hence, given system of axioms is not consistent.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Give a definition of the following term. Are there other terms that need to be defined first? What are they, and how might you define them?
parallel lines
In the following figure, if AC = BD, then prove that AB = CD.
It is known that if x + y = 10 then x + y + z = 10 + z. The Euclid’s axiom that illustrates this statement is ______.
Greek’s emphasised on ______.
Which of the following needs a proof?
The boundaries of the solids are curves.
The things which are double of the same thing are equal to one another.
Attempts to prove Euclid’s fifth postulate using the other postulates and axioms led to the discovery of several other geometries.
Solve the following question using appropriate Euclid’s axiom:
It is known that x + y = 10 and that x = z. Show that z + y = 10?
Solve the following question using appropriate Euclid’s axiom:
In the following figure, we have ∠1 = ∠3 and ∠2 = ∠4. Show that ∠A = ∠C.
