हिंदी

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.[(p → q) ∧ q] → p - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p→q) ∧ q]→p

योग
Advertisements

उत्तर

Consider the statement pattern : [(p → q) ∧ q ] → p

No. of rows = 2n = 2 × 2 = 4

No. of column = m + n = 3 + 2 = 5

Thus the truth table of the given logical statement:
[(p → q) ∧ q] → p

p q p → q (p → q) ∧ q [(p → q) ∧ q] → p
T T T T T
T F F F T
F T T T F
F F T F T

The entries in the last column of the above truth table are neither all T nor all F.

∴ [(p → q) ∧ q] → p is contingency.

shaalaa.com
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
अध्याय 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.2 [पृष्ठ १३]

APPEARS IN

बालभारती Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Arts and Science) [English] Standard 12 Maharashtra State Board
अध्याय 1 Mathematical Logic
Exercise 1.2 | Q 3.04 | पृष्ठ १३

वीडियो ट्यूटोरियलVIEW ALL [1]

संबंधित प्रश्न

Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`


Write converse and inverse of the following statement: 
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.” 


Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~ q)


Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p ∧ q) → q


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)


Using the truth table, verify

~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Karina is very good or everybody likes her.


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p → q) ∨ (p → r)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.

Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.


Write the dual of the following

(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)


The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______


Examine whether the statement pattern

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.


Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?


Using truth table verify that:

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q


Write the negation of the following statement:

(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×