Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p→q) ∧ q]→p
Advertisements
उत्तर
Consider the statement pattern : [(p → q) ∧ q ] → p
No. of rows = 2n = 2 × 2 = 4
No. of column = m + n = 3 + 2 = 5
Thus the truth table of the given logical statement:
[(p → q) ∧ q] → p
| p | q | p → q | (p → q) ∧ q | [(p → q) ∧ q] → p |
| T | T | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | F | T |
| F | T | T | T | F |
| F | F | T | F | T |
The entries in the last column of the above truth table are neither all T nor all F.
∴ [(p → q) ∧ q] → p is contingency.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T
Write converse and inverse of the following statement:
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.”
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )
Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]
Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈ N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7
State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
√-4 is a rational number.
Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
(~ p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
~ p → (p → ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)
Write the dual of the following:
(p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
13 is prime number and India is a democratic country.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.
Write the negation of the following statement.
All the stars are shining if it is night.
Write the negation of the following statement.
Some continuous functions are differentiable.
Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.
"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"
What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.
“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively
The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.
Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?
Using truth table verify that:
(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.
