हिंदी

Assertion: the Reservation of Thirty-three Percent of Seats for Women in Parliament and State Legislature Does Not Require Constitutional Amendment.

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and other as Reason (R).
You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option.

Assertion: The reservation of thirty-three percent of seats for women in Parliament and State Legislature does not require Constitutional Amendment.

Reason: Political parties contesting elections can allocate thirty-three percent of seats they contest to women candidates without any Constitutional Amendment.

विकल्प

  • Both A and R are individually true and R is correct explanation to A

  • Both A and Rare individually true but R is not correct explanation of A

  • A is true but R is false

  • A is false but R is true

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

A is false but R is true

shaalaa.com
Indian Constitution (Entrance Exams)
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2014-2015 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्न

Direction: The passage given below is followed by a set of question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.

Under our Constitution, the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary all have their own broad spheres of operation. Ordinarily it is not proper for any of these three organs of the State to encroach upon the domain of another, otherwise the delicate balance in the Constitution will be upset, and there will be a reaction. Judges must know their limits and must not try to run the Government. They must have modesty and humility, and not behave like Emperors. There is broad separation of powers under the Constitution and each organ of the State the legislature, the executive and the judiciary must have respect for the others and must not encroach into each other’s domains.

The theory of separation of powers first propounded by the French thinker Montesquieu (in his book ‘The Spirit of Laws' broadly holds the field in India too. In chapter XI of his book ‘The Spirit of Laws’ Montesquieu writes:

When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner. Again, there is no liberty, if the judicial power is not separated from the legislative and executive. Were it joined with the legislative, the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control; for the judge would be then the legislator. Were it joined to the executive power, the judge might behave with violence and oppression.

In India, the judiciary occupies an important place. The constitution visualizes an independent judiciary to safeguard the rights of citizens. In a democratic polity, the independent judiciary is a sine qua non to the effective functioning of the system. Administration has to function according to the law and the Constitution. The judiciary has an important role to play in protecting the citizen against the arbitrary exercise of power by administration. In the context of ever-expanding activities of government and discretionary powers vested in the various administrative agencies and public officials, the need to protect and safeguard the citizen's rights assumes significance and priority. In developing societies where the state is playing an important role in development, judiciary has a special responsibility to ensure social justice to the underprivileged sections of the community. However, it must be admitted that the courts cannot interfere in the administrative activities on their own accord even if such activities are arbitrary. They act only when their intervention is sought. Judicial intervention is restrictive in nature and limited in its scope.

Suppose the Judiciary has intervened in the questions involving, allotment of a particular bungalow to a Judge, specific bungalows for the Judges pool, monkeys capering in colonies, stray cattle on the streets, will it be safe to say that the Judiciary is disturbing the delicate balance of the Constitution?


The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and other as Reason (R).
You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option.

Assertion: The Council of Ministers at the center is collectively responsib1e both to the Lok Sabha and Rajya sabha.

Reason: Title members of both Lok Sabtla and Raj ya Sabha are eligible to be ministers of the Union Government.


Mark the best option:
Free legal aid for an accused is a ____________?


The law which provides special powers to the Armed Forces in India is popularly known as:


The plan to transfer power to the Indians and partition of the country was laid down in the?


In the question given below are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R). In the context of the two statements, which of the following is correct? 
Assertion (A): The Directive Principles enshrined in the Constitution aim at providing the social and economic base of genuine democracy.
Reason (R): The Directive Principles are merely directives which the government has to keep in mind while framing policy and are not enforceable through the court.


In which of the following Article in the Constitution of India deals with the Parliament which consists of the President, the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha?


Answer the question which follows from the application of the under mentioned legal principle.

Principle: All citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression.

Facts: X, a famous writer and Novelist criticized another novelist, B stating that: "the novel of B is foolish, he is a weak man, his Novel is indecent, his mind is impure, he is not of a good character, he should write decent and good Novel." Can X be sued for defamation? 


Answer the question which follows from the application of the under mentioned legal principle.

To whom, among the following, is the right of private defence is available?

  1. Only to the defender being a preventive right
  2. An aggressor, while facing action on the part of the defender which is excessive

Select the correct answer using the code given below:


__________ of the Constitution of India lays down that Union of India and the States are juristic person and can sue and be sued.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×