Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and other as Reason (R).
You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option.
Assertion: The Council of Ministers at the center is collectively responsib1e both to the Lok Sabha and Rajya sabha.
Reason: Title members of both Lok Sabtla and Raj ya Sabha are eligible to be ministers of the Union Government.
विकल्प
Both A and R are individually true and R is correct explanation to A
Both A and R are individually true but R is not correct exp1anation of A
A is true but R is false
A is false but R is true
Advertisements
उत्तर
A is false but R is true
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Which was the law introduced by Sir William Bentinck to prohibit the practice of Sati?
In which Amendment act the Sindhi language was included as 15th regional language in the Eight Schedule?
Under the Government of India Act, 1935, which communities were provided separate representation in the electorate system?
The cardinal features of the political system in India are
- It is a democratic republic.
- It has a parliamentary form of government.
- The Supreme power vests in the people of India.
Select the correct answer using the codes given below.
In United States, the residuary power lies with ______________.
Arrange the following Indian states in chronological order, according to their formation?
- Chhattisgarh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Jharkhand
- Sikkim
Which of the following Article deals with the disqualification of a member of Parliament?
Which of the following taxes is/are levied by the Union and collected and appropriated by the States?
Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
Factual Situation: In order to ensure that people live in an amicable atmosphere the Government of India decided to abolish courts and constituted Dispute Settlement Boards. Further to achieve this objective, the law stipulated that lawyers should not be allowed to espouse the claims of parties, and instead their claims be espoused by social workers.
Legal Principles:
I. Any law made by the Parliament that infringes the fundamental rights of the citizens is invalid and unenforceable.
II. Freedom to carry on trade or profession of one’s own choice is a fundamental right.
III. The Parliament is competent to impose reasonable restrictions on the exercise of this right.
IV. If the restrictions, on fundamental rights imposed by the Parliament, totally removes or nullifies any fundamental right then it will be construed as an unreasonable restriction. Decision:
Principle: Damage without the violation of a legal right is not actionable in a court of law. If the interference with the rights of another person is not unlawful or unauthorized, but a necessary consequence of the exercise of defendant's own lawful rights, no action should lie.
Facts: There was an Established School ('ES') in a particular locality. Subsequently, a New School ('NS') was set up in the same locality, which charged lower fees, on account of which people started patronizing the new school. Because of the competition, 'ES' had to reduce its fees. 'ES' filed a case against 'NS' saying that 'NS' had caused it ('ES') financial loss and thus claimed compensation. Which of the following derivations is correct?
