Please select a subject first
Advertisements
Advertisements
Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:
| The ordinal list revolution originates in the criticism of the psychological foundations of the theory of demand, namely, the principle of decreasing marginal utility as Alfred Marshall ([1890] 1898) used it. The rejection of hedonist hypotheses led Irving Fisher (1892) and Pareto (1896-97, 1900, 1909) to favour an objective or "positive" approach to economic concepts. The "ordinal list revolution" (Omarzabal 1995, 116) is grounded in a methodological transformation of economics that put the facts of objective experience as a foundation of economics and provided a research program for the ensuing years (Green and Moss 1993; Lewin 1996). Mathematically, ordinalism is entirely based upon the idea that one can dispense with the use of a specific utility function and that no meaning shall be attached to utility measurement, except as an ordinal principle. Clearly, the development of ordinalism must be separated from the introduction of the concept of the indifference curve. Ordinalism was first advocated in Fisher's "Mathematics Investigations" (1892) and Pareto's Sunto (1900) and Manual ([1909] 1971), while the indifference curve had appeared in F. Y. Edge Worth's Mathematical Psychics (1881). It was thus only through Fisher's and Pareto's recasting that the concept of the indifference curve became irreversibly associated with the promotion of ordinalism. Along the way, the recasting of the theory of choice along ordinal list lines raised a number of issues (about integrability, measurability, and complementarity) that would be progressively settled. The reasonable closing date for the ordinalist revolution is 1950, after Houthakker's (1950) and Samuelson's (1950) contributions. From the late 1920s, the Paretian school was progressively gaining a larger audience while the use of the concept of marginal utility and other derivative concepts was challenged. Consequently, demand theory was recast along with the principles of individual preferences and ordinal utility functions. Nevertheless, English authors proved very silent about the meaning of indifference curves. Most if not all of the reflections after 1920 about the nature of indifference curves took place in America, mainly under the impulse of Henry Schultz at Chicago. This is an American story. |
Consider the given statement:
Under the Cardinal Utility approach, utility is measured in utility.
Concept: undefined >> undefined
Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:
| The ordinal list revolution originates in the criticism of the psychological foundations of the theory of demand, namely, the principle of decreasing marginal utility as Alfred Marshall ([1890] 1898) used it. The rejection of hedonist hypotheses led Irving Fisher (1892) and Pareto (1896-97, 1900, 1909) to favour an objective or "positive" approach to economic concepts. The "ordinal list revolution" (Omarzabal 1995, 116) is grounded in a methodological transformation of economics that put the facts of objective experience as a foundation of economics and provided a research program for the ensuing years (Green and Moss 1993; Lewin 1996). Mathematically, ordinalism is entirely based upon the idea that one can dispense with the use of a specific utility function and that no meaning shall be attached to utility measurement, except as an ordinal principle. Clearly, the development of ordinalism must be separated from the introduction of the concept of the indifference curve. Ordinalism was first advocated in Fisher's "Mathematics Investigations" (1892) and Pareto's Sunto (1900) and Manual ([1909] 1971), while the indifference curve had appeared in F. Y. Edge Worth's Mathematical Psychics (1881). It was thus only through Fisher's and Pareto's recasting that the concept of the indifference curve became irreversibly associated with the promotion of ordinalism. Along the way, the recasting of the theory of choice along ordinal list lines raised a number of issues (about integrability, measurability, and complementarity) that would be progressively settled. The reasonable closing date for the ordinalist revolution is 1950, after Houthakker's (1950) and Samuelson's (1950) contributions. From the late 1920s, the Paretian school was progressively gaining a larger audience while the use of the concept of marginal utility and other derivative concepts was challenged. Consequently, demand theory was recast along with the principles of individual preferences and ordinal utility functions. Nevertheless, English authors proved very silent about the meaning of indifference curves. Most if not all of the reflections after 1920 about the nature of indifference curves took place in America, mainly under the impulse of Henry Schultz at Chicago. This is an American story. |
______ is a curve showing different combinations of two goods, each combination offering the same level of satisfaction to the consumer.
Concept: undefined >> undefined
Advertisements
Point out a demerit of the fixed exchange rate.
Concept: undefined >> undefined
______ is the output at base-year prices.
Concept: undefined >> undefined
Growth of GDP and Major Sectors (in %)
| Column I | Column II |
| (1) Feature of Perfect Competition | (a) Only one buyer |
| (2) Feature of the Monopoly Market | (b) Only a few sellers |
| (3) Features of Monopolistic Competition | (c) a Large Number of Buyers and Sellers |
| (4) Features of the Monopoly Market | (d) Only a few buyers |
Concept: undefined >> undefined
Marginal revenue equals ______ price.
Concept: undefined >> undefined
What does Real GDP show?
Concept: undefined >> undefined
If Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) is 0.25 and the initial change in investment is ₹ 250 crores, then the final change in income would be ______.
Concept: undefined >> undefined
The focus of government budget is to:
Concept: undefined >> undefined
GDP is not an appropriate indicator of welfare because of:
Concept: undefined >> undefined
For a consumer to recognize how many commodities he/she should buy, which approach is used?
Concept: undefined >> undefined
Identify the correct pair as given in Column B by matching them with respective concepts in Column A:
| Column A | Column B | ||
| (1) | Reduction in the value of the domestic currency by the government | (a) | Devaluation |
| (2) | Reduction in the value of the domestic currency through market forces | (b) | Appreciation |
| (3) | Increase in the value of the domestic currency by the government | (c) | Depreciation |
| (4) | Increase in the value of the domestic currency through market forces | (d) | Revaluation |
Concept: undefined >> undefined
Assertion (A): GDP does not exhibit the structure of the product.
Reason (R): If the increase in GDP is mainly due to increased production of war equipment and ammunitions, then such an increase cannot improve welfare in the economy.
Concept: undefined >> undefined
The slope of the Total Revenue equals ______
Concept: undefined >> undefined
Consider the following statements:
-
The use of public parks increases welfare
-
The distribution of GDP increases welfare
-
Higher GDP always causes higher welfare
Which of the above statements are false?
Concept: undefined >> undefined
What does the Factor Cost represent?
Concept: undefined >> undefined
Economists like Adam Smith follow which school of economics?
Concept: undefined >> undefined
Identify the objective of the budget.
Concept: undefined >> undefined
Production possibility curve slopes downwards from ______ to ______.
Concept: undefined >> undefined
Which of the following is the result of increase in price of factors of production?
Concept: undefined >> undefined
