Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Read the following information carefully and choose the appropriate option in the questions given below:
i. There is a group of five persons – A, B, C, D and E.
ii. One of them is a Singer, one is a Dancer, one is a Painter, one is a teacher and one is a Doctor.
iii. Three of them – A, C and Doctor prefer rice to chapatti and two of them – B and the Painter prefer chapatti to rice.
iv. The Teacher, D and A are friends to one another but two of these prefer chapatti to rice.
v. The Singer is C’s brother.
Who is a Dancer?
पर्याय
C
E
D
A
Advertisements
उत्तर
C
Explanation:
| Person | Profession | Preference |
| A | Singer | Rice to Chapatti |
| B | Teacher | Chapatti to rice |
| C | Dancer | Rice ti Chapati |
| D | Painter | Chapatti to Rice |
| E | Doctor | Rice to Chapatti |
C is a Dancer.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Find the odd one out :
Symphony, Orchestra, Guitar, Mob
Find the odd one out of the following group.
Windshield, Spark plug, Clutch pedal, Car, Engine
Identify the statement which cannot be true
The question contains six statements followed by four sets of combinations of three. Choose the set, which gives the most logical triad. i.e. the third statement mentioned should be a conclusion drawn from the first two statements.
Statements:
- Some men are of short- height.
- Short-heighted men are intelligent.
- Sudhir is a man.
- Sudhir is of short-height.
- Sudhir is intelligent.
- AII men are intelligent.
Ornithologist : Bird :: Archealogist : ?
How many hexagon (six sided figures) can you find here?

In the following questions find which one word cannot be formed from the letters of the given words using each letter only once:
COMPENSATION
The question has a main statement followed by four statements labelled I, II, III, and IV. Choose the ordered pair of statements, where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.
Every player will become a champ.
A. Rajesh is a player.
B. Rajesh will become champ.
C. Rajesh is not a player.
D. Rajesh will not become a champ.
In the question given below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement
- Sealed tenders are invited from competent contractors experienced in executing construction jobs.
Conclusions
- Tenders are invited only from experienced contractors.
- It is difficult to find competent tenders in construction jobs.
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and ill. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement
- Should the salary and perquisites of public sector undertaking employees be made equivalent to those in the private sector?
Arguments
- Yes, this will help the public sector undertaking to attract and retain a competent workforce.
- No, public sector undertakings cannot afford to pay salaries to the level of the private sector.
- Yes, otherwise the public sector undertakings will not be able to compete with the private sector organisations.
