Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Using the truth table, verify
~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p
Advertisements
उत्तर
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| p | q | ~p | (p∨q) | ~(p∨q) | ~p∧q | ~(p∨q)∨(~p∧q) |
| T | T | F | T | F | F | F |
| T | F | F | T | F | F | F |
| F | T | T | T | F | T | T |
| F | F | T | F | T | F | T |
In the above truth table, the entries in columns 3 and 7 are identical.
∴ ~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :
(p ∨ q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T
Show that the following statement pattern in contingency :
(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)]
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Write the negation of the following statement.
All the stars are shining if it is night.
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
Write the dual of the following.
(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)
Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.
Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.
Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.
“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”
Choose the correct alternative:
If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.
