Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Using the truth table, verify.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Prove that the following pair of statement patterns is equivalent.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) and (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Advertisements
उत्तर
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| p | q | r | q∧r | p∨(q∧r) | p∨q | p∨r | (p∨q)∧(p∨r) |
| T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T |
| T | T | F | F | T | T | T | T |
| T | F | T | F | T | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | F | T | T | T | T |
| F | T | T | T | T | T | T | T |
| F | T | F | F | F | T | F | F |
| F | F | T | F | F | F | T | F |
| F | F | F | F | F | F | F | F |
The entries in columns 5 and 8 are identical.
∴ p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."
Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈ N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p → q) ∨ (q → p)
Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r
(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)
Using the truth table, verify
~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p
Write the dual of the following:
~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]
Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.
"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)
What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]
Write the dual of the following.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ r)
Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.
“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”
The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)
The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.
Write the negation of the following statement:
(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.
