CUET (UG) entrance exam Question Bank Solutions

A can do a work in 6 days and B in 9 days. How many days wlll both take together to complete the work?

A. B and C together can complete a piece of work in 30 minutes. A and B together can complete the same work in 50 minutes. C alone can complete the work in ______.

Working 8 hours a day, Anu can copy a book in 18 days. How many hours a day should she work so as to finish the work in 12 days?

5 men can do a piece of work in 6 days while 10 women can do it in 5 days. In how many days can 5 women and 3 men do it?

Anil can do a job in 10 days. Sunn is 40% more efficient than Anil. Find the no. of days required by Sunil to do the same job.

Puja is 30% less efficient than Poonam. If Poonam takes 20 days to do a job, how many days would Puja take to do the work.

8 men can finish half of the work in 3 days. If the remaining work is to be completed in 2 days. then the no. of additional men required are?

15 men and 7 women can mow a field in 10 days. In how many days can 30 men and 14 women mow a field thrice as big as the previous one?

26 men can complete a piece of work in 17 days. How many more men must be hired to complete the work in 13 days?

Five men can complete a piece of work in 24 days. In how many days will 12 men complete the same piece of work?

A project manager hired 16 men to complete a project in 38 days. However, after 30 days, he realized that only `5/9`th of the work is complete. How many more men does he need to hire to complete the project on time?

B is `4/3` times as efficient as A. If A can complete `5/8`th of a given task in 15 days, what fraction of the same task would remain incomplete if B works on it independently for 10 days only?

Two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and IL Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements: No bowler is a batsman.

Some bowlers are fielders.

Conclusions:

1. No fielder is a batsman.
2. No batsman is a bowler.

Two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and IL Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements: No bowler is a batsman.

Some bowlers are fielders.

Conclusions:

1. No fielder is a batsman.
2. No batsman is a bowler.

Two statements are followed by alternatives. Mark the correct alternative that follows:

All Asians are wise.

All Chinese are Asian.

Therefore:

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some Conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the Conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusion logically follows the given statements. 

Statements:

1. No statue is an icon
2. Some busts are statues 

Conclusions: 

1. No icon is bust
2. All busts are icons 

In the question below are two or three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts? 

Statements:

1. Some songs are long.
2. All longs are shorts.

Conclusions:

1. All longs are songs.
2. All shorts are longs. 

In the question below are two or three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts? 

Statements:

1. Some phones are bangles.
2. Some bangles are rings.
3. All rings are sticks.

Conclusion: 

1. Some rings are phones.
2. Some sticks are bangles

In the question below are two or three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts? 

Statements:

1. All rods are sticks.
2. No stick ls a pole.

Conclusion: 

1. All poles being rods is a possibility.
2. Some sticks are not rods.

Who built the Jama Masjid?