हिंदी

Who Called Indian Constitution as Quasi-federal? - Mathematics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Who called Indian constitution as Quasi-Federal?

विकल्प

  • Austin

  • K C. Wheare

  • H. M Servai

  • Jennings

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

K C. Wheare

shaalaa.com
Indian Constitution (Entrance Exams)
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2014-2015 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्न

Fill in the blanks: Choose the pair of words that complete the sentence to make logical sense.

The Union Government on the recommendation of the ________ under the chairmanship of __________ has decided to decriminalize Section ________ of the Indian Penal Code.


Which article is related to "Equal Justice and free legal aid"?


Given below is the statement of Legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
LEGAL PRINCIPLE: A power conferred by a statute cannot be withdrawn by subordinate legislation.
FACTUAL SITUATION: The Cinematograph Act conferred powers upon the District Magistrate (DM) to grant license subject to the control of the government. The government framed Rules under the said Act. The effect of these Rules was that the licensing power stood transferred to the Government itself and the District Magistrate was rendered powerless. Whether such Rules are valid?
DECISION :


Which of the following amendment Right to Property was deleted from Fundamental Right?


The qualification of appointment of Judges is falls under the


The High Court of a State is under the direct supervision of


The National Commission of Scheduled Tribes has been established under the 


Consider the following statements:

I. In a recent Supreme Court verdict pronounced by Justice Markandeya Katju and Justice Gyan Sudha Mishra, the court upheld the constitutionality of the Haj subsidy

II. Muslims are not the only beneficiaries of the secular state’s generosity. Hindus have also received substantial financial support from the Government With reference to the statements mentioned above, which of the following is correct?


The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.

Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offense, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offense.

Facts: A intentionally omitted to give food to his father. He also used to beat his father. Consequently, A's father died.


Principle: The Constitution of India guarantees the 'right to life', which means 'right to live with human dignity'. The right to life under the constitution, however, does not include the right to die.

Facts: 'M' who is 90, lives all alone as he has no family or children or grandchildren. He suffers from physical and mental distress, as there is no one to look after him. He has little means to foot his medical expenses. Under these circumstances, he approaches the court with a prayer that he should be granted the right to die with dignity because he does not want to be a burden on society. Further, as it is his life, he has a right to put an end to it.
Which of the following derivations is correct?


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×