Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Choose the most appropriate option:
Which among the following was described by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar as the "heart and soul of the Constitution of India"?
विकल्प
Freedom of Religion
Right to Constitutional Remedies
Right to equality
Right to move throughout the territory of India
Advertisements
उत्तर
Right to Constitutional Remedies
Explanation:
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar called Article 32 of the Indian Constitution i.e. Right to Constitutional remedies as 'the heart and soul of the Constitution'.
It was made so because the mere declaration of the fundamental right without effective machinery for enforcement of the fundamental rights would have been meaningless. Also, a right that does not have a remedy is a worthless declaration. Thus, the framers of our constitution adopted the special provisions in article 32 which provided remedies to the violated fundamental rights of a citizen.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Mark the best option:
Who appoints the Advocate General?
Mark the best option:
WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly ...... to constitute India into a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic.
In which Constitutional Amendment Act seats of Lok Sabha were increased from 525 to 545?
Which Article ensures the abolition of Untouchability?
Who is the head of the Judiciary in the State?
Which one of the following changes has not been made to the Citizenship Act of India by the Amendment in 2015?
"To provide free local aid to an accused" is covered under _________.
By which of the following warrant under his hand and seal Governor is appointed?
The Union Territories are administered by
Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
Factual Situation: In order to ensure that people live in an amicable atmosphere the Government of India decided to abolish courts and constituted Dispute Settlement Boards. Further to achieve this objective, the law stipulated that lawyers should not be allowed to espouse the claims of parties, and instead their claims be espoused by social workers.
Legal Principles:
I. Any law made by the Parliament that infringes the fundamental rights of the citizens is invalid and unenforceable.
II. Freedom to carry on trade or profession of one’s own choice is a fundamental right.
III. The Parliament is competent to impose reasonable restrictions on the exercise of this right.
IV. If the restrictions, on fundamental rights imposed by the Parliament, totally removes or nullifies any fundamental right then it will be construed as an unreasonable restriction. Decision:
