हिंदी

Using Truth Table Examine Whether the Following Statement Pattern is Tautology, Contradiction Or Contingency - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`

Advertisements

उत्तर

`p`

`q`

`~q`

`p^^~q`

`p->q`

`(p^^~q)harr(p->q)`

T T F F T F
T F T T F F
F T F F T F
F F T F T F

All the entries in the last column of the above truth table are F.

`(p^^~q) harr (p->q)` is is a contradiction

shaalaa.com
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2012-2013 (March)

APPEARS IN

वीडियो ट्यूटोरियलVIEW ALL [1]

संबंधित प्रश्न

Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :

(p ∨ q) →  r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )


If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧  ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p → q) ∨ (q → p)


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

p → (~ p ∨ q)


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(~ p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~ q)


Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p ∧ q) → q


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


Fill in the blanks :

Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q


Write the dual of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Karina is very good or everybody likes her.


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.


Write the negation of the following statement.

∃ n ∈ N, (n2 + 2) is odd number.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

~(p ∨ q) → r


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Write the dual of the following.

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


The false statement in the following is ______.


If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively


Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:

(p→q)∧(p→r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

  1. `bar(PR)`  
  2. `bar(PM)`
  3. `bar(QM)`

Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×