Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Under the Constitution of India 'Right to Pollution Free Environment' has emerged as a fundamental right from the right to-
विकल्प
Freedom of movement under Article 19
Equality under Article 14
Life and personal liberty under Article 21
Conserve culture under Article 29.
Advertisements
उत्तर
Life and personal liberty under Article 21
Explanation:
According to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution of India, no person should be deprived of life and personal liberty except procedure established by law. Hence "Life and personal liberty under Article 21" is correct
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
One of the reasons for recusal of a Judge is that litigants/the public might entertain a reasonable apprehension about his impartiality. As Lord Chief Justice Hewart said: "It is not merely of some importance but is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done." And therefore, in order to uphold the credibility of the integrity institution, Judge recuses from hearing the case. A Judge of the Supreme Court or the High Court, while assuming Office, takes an oath as prescribed under Schedule III to the Constitution of India, that: "… I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established, that I will uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India, that I will duly and faithfully and to the best of my ability, knowledge and judgment perform the duties of my office without fear or favour, affection or ill-will and that I will uphold the Constitution and the laws." Called upon to discharge the duties of the Office without fear or favour, affection or ill-will, it is only desirable, if not proper, that a Judge, for any unavoidable reason like some pecuniary interest, affinity or adversity with the parties in the case, direct or indirect interest in the outcome of the litigation, family directly involved in litigation on the same issue elsewhere, the Judge being aware that he or someone in his immediate family has an interest, financial or otherwise that could have a substantial bearing as a consequence of the decision in the litigation, etc., to recuse himself from the adjudication of a particular matter. No doubt, these examples are not exhaustive. The simple question is, whether the adjudication by the Judge concerned, would cause reasonable doubt in the mind of a reasonably informed litigant and the fair-minded public as to his impartiality. Being an institution whose hallmark is transparency, it is only proper that the Judge discharging high and noble duties, at least broadly indicate the reasons for recusing from the case so that the litigants or the well-meaning public may not entertain any misunderstanding. Once the reasons for recusal are indicated, there will not be any room for attributing any motive for the recusal. To put it differently, it is part of his duty to be accountable to the Constitution by upholding it without fear or favour, affection or ill- will. Therefore, I am of the view that it is the constitutional duty, as reflected in one's oath, to be transparent and accountable, and hence, a Judge is required to indicate reasons for his recusal from a particular case.
If a judge reflects a predisposition so strong that it seems he had already made up his mind as to the outcome of the case, will it be according to judicial norms to ask for recusal by the litigants?
Mark the best option:
What is the quorum to constitute a meeting of either House?
The speaker can ask a member of the house to stop speaking and let another member speak. This is known as?
Given below is the statement of Legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
LEGAL PRINCIPLE: A power conferred by a statute cannot be withdrawn by subordinate legislation.
FACTUAL SITUATION: The Cinematograph Act conferred powers upon the District Magistrate (DM) to grant license subject to the control of the government. The government framed Rules under the said Act. The effect of these Rules was that the licensing power stood transferred to the Government itself and the District Magistrate was rendered powerless. Whether such Rules are valid?
DECISION :
In the final form of the Constitution adopted by the Constituent Assembly. How many Articles and Schedules were there?
The 97th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2011 added a new part to the Constitution. Which of the following is that part?
Who recommends a person who can be appointed as minister by the President?
The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible for whom?
The executive power relating to concurrent subjects remain with
__________ of the Constitution of India lays down that Union of India and the States are juristic person and can sue and be sued.
