Question

Two groups of political parties A and B discussed a policy for the underprivileged section. They decided to spend a certain percentage of their funds on implementing this policy. While party A was of the opinion that 40% funds should be invested in implementation of the policy, party B was not entirely supportive of this suggestion. However at the end of the discussion, party B was completely in favour of the suggestion made by party A.

1. Explain the social phenomenon evident in the final stance taken by party B. (2)
2. By referring to the concept of social phenomenon evident in the above scenario, describe any two reasons to explain the change in the stance of party B. (2)

Answer 1

i. Conformity is the social phenomenon that manifests itself in Party B’s final stance. Conformity is a type of social influence in which a person changes their beliefs or behaviour in order to fit in with a group or align with the thoughts of others. Party B initially disagreed, but subsequently aligned with Party A’s views.

ii. Reasons for the Change in Stance

1. Informational Social Influence: Party B may have altered their attitude after being persuaded by Party A’s logic, facts, or arguments. They accepted the 40% number because they concluded that Party A had better information or a more effective plan for the impoverished.
2. Normative Social Influence: Party B may have conformed in order to prevent conflict, maintain group cohesion, or win social favour during the conversation. Even if they had private reservations, they publicly agreed with Party A to maintain a cohesive front or viewed as cooperative.
3. Group Size and Unanimity: If Party A had presented a strong, united front, the pressure on Party B to conform would have increased dramatically. It is more difficult to stand alone when the other group is completely in agreement.