Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Mention the following.
Two oppressive policies of the British.
Advertisements
उत्तर
The British decided to do away with import duty on goods manufactured in England. This severely affected Indian industries.
In 1818, they passed Regulation III. Under it, an Indian could be jailed without trial in a court.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Read stanza 3, and then, describe Macavity in two or three sentences of your own.
“The summit of the mind” refers to
(i) great intellectual achievements.
(ii) the process of maturing mentally and spiritually.
(iii) overcoming personal ambition for the common welfare.
(iv) living in a world of thought and imagination.
(v) the triumph of mind over worldly pleasures for a noble cause.
(vi) a fuller knowledge of oneself.
Mark the item(s) not relevant.
Write ‘True’ or ‘False’ against the following statement.
The Great Stone Face stood near where Ernest and his mother lived.
How did the doe save Penny’s life?
Answer the following question.
What general conclusion does the writer draw from this comparison?
In the first stanza, find words that show that it was very cold.
What was the story attributed to the Stone Face?
Write ‘Ernest’ or ‘Poet’, against statement below.
He lacked faith in his own thoughts.
Write ‘Ernest’ or ‘Poet’, against statement below.
Greatness lies in truth. Truth is best expressed in one’s actions. He was truthful, therefore he was great.
Did Ernest believe that the old prophecy had come true? What did he say about it?
Mark the meaning that best fits the word or a phrase in the story.
(a night’s) shelter
What, according to you, is the story about ? Consider the following:
When spring came, it was still winter in the garden. What does winter stand for or indicate here?
What was her mother’s reaction to it?
Is fighting the only way of resolving differences of opinion? What else can be done to reach a mutually acceptable settlement ?
What was the girl’s explanation for his lightning exit?
What was Duttada’s secret ambition?
What did the scientists at the conference say about James’s ‘sums’?
Should a scientist’s findings be suppressed if they seem disturbing? Give reasons for and against the topic.
