Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
If Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) is 0.25 and the initial change in investment is ₹ 250 crores, then the final change in income would be ______.
विकल्प
₹ 1000 crores
₹ 1200 crores
₹ 500 crores
₹ 3500 crores
Advertisements
उत्तर
₹ 1000 crores
Explanation:
ΔY = `Δ"I" xx 1/("MPS")`
ΔY = `₹ 250 xx 1/0.25`
= ₹ 1,000 crores
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
AR curve is a horizontal straight line, the MR curve will be ______
Total output is maximum when marginal product is ______
Identify the correct pair of items from the following Columns I and II:
| Columns I | Columns II |
| (1) Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS) | (a) It states the real employment of the consumer from which he can purchase certain qualitative bundles of three goods at given price. |
| (2) Consumer's Bundle | (b) It refers to the number of units of good Y which the consumer is willing to gain for an additional unit of goodX. |
| (3) Budget set | (c) It is quantitative combination of those bundles which a consumer can purchase from his given income at prevailing market prices. |
| (4) Consumer Budget | (d) It is a qualitative combination of three goods which can be purchased by a consumer from his given expenses at given prices. |
Condition for equilibrium in monopoly:
- MC is equal to MR.
- MC curve cuts the MR from below.
The marginal revenue curve shows the relationship between ______ and ______.
Statement 1: Marginal revenue curve is parallel to the x-axis.
Statement 2: The slope of the marginal revenue curve is upward sloping.
Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:
| The ordinal list revolution originates in the criticism of the psychological foundations of the theory of demand, namely, the principle of decreasing marginal utility as Alfred Marshall ([1890] 1898) used it. The rejection of hedonist hypotheses led Irving Fisher (1892) and Pareto (1896-97, 1900, 1909) to favour an objective or "positive" approach to economic concepts. The "ordinal list revolution" (Omarzabal 1995, 116) is grounded in a methodological transformation of economics that put the facts of objective experience as a foundation of economics and provided a research program for the ensuing years (Green and Moss 1993; Lewin 1996). Mathematically, ordinalism is entirely based upon the idea that one can dispense with the use of a specific utility function and that no meaning shall be attached to utility measurement, except as an ordinal principle. Clearly, the development of ordinalism must be separated from the introduction of the concept of the indifference curve. Ordinalism was first advocated in Fisher's "Mathematics Investigations" (1892) and Pareto's Sunto (1900) and Manual ([1909] 1971), while the indifference curve had appeared in F. Y. Edge Worth's Mathematical Psychics (1881). It was thus only through Fisher's and Pareto's recasting that the concept of the indifference curve became irreversibly associated with the promotion of ordinalism. Along the way, the recasting of the theory of choice along ordinal list lines raised a number of issues (about integrability, measurability, and complementarity) that would be progressively settled. The reasonable closing date for the ordinalist revolution is 1950, after Houthakker's (1950) and Samuelson's (1950) contributions. From the late 1920s, the Paretian school was progressively gaining a larger audience while the use of the concept of marginal utility and other derivative concepts was challenged. Consequently, demand theory was recast along with the principles of individual preferences and ordinal utility functions. Nevertheless, English authors proved very silent about the meaning of indifference curves. Most if not all of the reflections after 1920 about the nature of indifference curves took place in America, mainly under the impulse of Henry Schultz at Chicago. This is an American story. |
Consider the given statement:
Under the Cardinal Utility approach, utility is measured in utility.
Marginal revenue equals ______ price.
For a consumer to recognize how many commodities he/she should buy, which approach is used?
Assertion (A): MRS is defined as the amount of good Y given up in exchange for good X such that the total utility is constant.
Reason (R): Diminishing MRS means the consumer wants to give up lesser units of Y in exchange for good X.
Which of the following statement is true?
______ is a tabular representation which shows various quantities of a commodity being supplied at various levels of price.
What does ordinal utility mean?
Which axis represents “Food” in a standard indifference curve diagram?
In real life, indifference curves can represent choices like ______.
