हिंदी

Identify the argument which cannot be accepted.

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Identify the argument which cannot be accepted.

विकल्प

  • All wives are married. Therefore, all married people are wives.

  • All unmarried women are spinsters. Therefore, all spinsters are women.

  • All equilateral triangles are equiangular. Therefore, all equiangular triangles are equilateral.

  • All rainy days are wet days. Therefore, all wet days are rainy days.

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

All wives are married. Therefore, all married people are wives.

Explanation:

All wives are married Therefore, all married people are wives cannot be accepted.

shaalaa.com
Syllogism and Critical Reasoning (Entrance Exam)
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2015-2016 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्न

Statement: The distance of 900 km by road between Bombay and Jafra will be reduced to 280 km by sea. This will lead to a saving of Rs. 7.92 crores per annum on fuel.

Conclusions

I. Transportation by sea is cheaper than that by road.
II. Fuel must be saved to the greatest extent.


Statement: This book 'Z' is the only book that focuses its attention on the problem of poverty in India between 1950 and 1980.

Conclusions:
I. There was no question of poverty before 1950.

II. No other book deals with poverty in India during 1950 to 1980.


In the following question, two statements followed by four conclusions I, II, III and IV. You have to accept the given statements to be true, even if they appear to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two statements:

statement I: All girls are students.
Statement II: All doctors are students.

Conclusions:
I. All girls are students.
II. Some students are girls.
III. Some students are doctors.
IV. All doctors are girls.


In the question below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements :

  1. All bottles are glasses.
  2. No cup is a glass.

Conclusions

  1. No bottle is a cup.
  2. At least some glasses are bottles.

In the questions below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they #seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements 

  1. All windows are doors.
  2. All entrances are windows.
  3. No gate is a door.

Conclusions

  1. At least some windows are gates.
  2. No gate is an entrance.

The question below is given three statements followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements 

  1. All calculators are boxes.
  2. All boxes are taps.
  3. Some taps are machines.

Conclusions

  1. Some machines are boxes.
  2. Some taps are calculators.
  3. Some boxes are calculators.

The question below is given three statements followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements 

  1. Some books are papers.
  2. Some papers are desks.
  3. Some desks are chairs.

Conclusions

  1. Some books are desks.
  2. Some papers are chairs.
  3. Some books are chairs.

The question contains four arguments of three sentences each. Choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.

Argument 1. No moon is red. All-stars are the moon. All stars are red.
Argument 2. All doors are open. No open is outdoors. All doors are not outdoors.
Argument 3. No Japanese can fire. All Chinese are books. Japanese and Chinese can fight.
Argument 4. No A is B. No B is C. No A is C.


In the question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements:

  • All keys are locks.
  • All locks are bangles.
  • All bangles are cars.

conclusions

  1. Some cars are locks.
  2. Some bangles are keys.
  3. Some cars are keys.

Two statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements: Some Pans are Bottles.
All Bottles are Mugs.

Conclusions: I. All Mugs are Bottles.
II. Some Mugs are Pans.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×