हिंदी

Identify the argument which cannot be accepted. - Mathematics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Identify the argument which cannot be accepted.

विकल्प

  • All wives are married. Therefore, all married people are wives.

  • All unmarried women are spinsters. Therefore, all spinsters are women.

  • All equilateral triangles are equiangular. Therefore, all equiangular triangles are equilateral.

  • All rainy days are wet days. Therefore, all wet days are rainy days.

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

All wives are married. Therefore, all married people are wives.

Explanation:

All wives are married Therefore, all married people are wives cannot be accepted.

shaalaa.com
Syllogism and Critical Reasoning (Entrance Exam)
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2015-2016 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्न

The questions below have two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
I. No athletes are vegetarians.
II. All players are athletes.
II. Therefore, ________________


The questions below have two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statement:
I. One who has squared a circle is not a mathematician
II. Therefore ______________


Read the information given and answer the question that follows.
Statement: Of all the television sets manufactured in India, the ‘Solar’ brand has the largest sale in India
Conclusions:

  1. The volume of sales of all the brands of television sets manufactured in India is known.
  2. The production of no other television set in India is as large as that of ‘Solar’.

Considering given statements as true, select a logical conclusion based on the given statements.

Statements:

  • All boots are sandals.
  • No sandal is shoe.
  • All shoes are rings.

Conclusions:

  1. Some boots are rings.
  2. All sandals are boots.
  3. Some rings are sandals.
  4. All rings are shoes 

In the following question, compares two statements. You have to take the statements as true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

I. Some beautiful women are actresses.
II. All actresses are good dancers.
Which of the following derivations is correct?


In the question below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements :

  1. All bottles are glasses.
  2. No cup is a glass.

Conclusions

  1. No bottle is a cup.
  2. At least some glasses are bottles.

In the questions below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they #seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements 

  1. No bangle is an earring.
  2. Some earrings are rings.

Conclusions

  1. No ring is a bangle.
  2. Some rings are definitely not earrings.

Three statements are given, following by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements: Some advocates are doctors. Some doctors are players. All players are engineers.

Conclusions:

  1. Some players are doctors.
  2. Some engineers are advocates.
  3. All advocates are engineers.
  4. Some engineers are doctors.

In the question below are two or three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts? 

Statements:

  1. Some phones are bangles.
  2. Some bangles are rings.
  3. All rings are sticks.

Conclusion: 

  1. Some rings are phones.
  2. Some sticks are bangles

In the question below are two or three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts? 

Statements:

  1. All rods are sticks.
  2. No stick ls a pole.

Conclusion: 

  1. All poles being rods is a possibility.
  2. Some sticks are not rods.

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×