Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Identify the argument which cannot be accepted.
विकल्प
All wives are married. Therefore, all married people are wives.
All unmarried women are spinsters. Therefore, all spinsters are women.
All equilateral triangles are equiangular. Therefore, all equiangular triangles are equilateral.
All rainy days are wet days. Therefore, all wet days are rainy days.
Advertisements
उत्तर
All wives are married. Therefore, all married people are wives.
Explanation:
All wives are married Therefore, all married people are wives cannot be accepted.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Read the following statement considering them to be true and therefore judge their conclusions numbered I, II and III and given your answer accordingly.
Statements: Some tables are chairs. All chairs are benches. All benches are desks.
Conclusions:
I. Some desks are table
II. Some benches are tables.
III. Some desks are chairs.
Considering given statements as true, select a logical conclusion based on the given statements.
Statements:
- Lady's Finger is tastier than cabbage
- Cauliflower is tastier than Lady's Finger
- Cabbage is not tastier than peas
Considering given statements as true, select a logical conclusion based on the given statements.
Statements:
- Some cats are animals.
- All plants are animals.
- All animals are plants.
Conclusions:
- Some cats are plants.
- All plants are animals.
- All animals are cats.
- All plants are cats.
Statement: Prime age school-going children in urban India have now become avid as well as more regular viewers of television, even in households without a TV. As a result there has been an alarming decline in the extent of readership of newspapers.
Conclusions:
I. Method of increasing the readership of newspapers should be devised.
II. A team of experts should be sent to other countries to study the impact of TV. on the readership of newspapers.
Six statements are given. Below them sets of three statements are given. Decide which set has third sentence as logical conclusion of first and second sentences considering the first two statements to be correct.
(A) All apples are pears.
(B) Some pears are mangoes.
(C) Some mangoes are not apples.
(D) All pears are apples.
(E) No mango is a pear.
(F) No apples are mangoes.
The question contains four arguments of three sentences each Choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.
Argument 1. Shahrukh is an actor. Some actors are pretty. Shahrukh is pretty
Argument 2. Some executives are soldiers. All soldiers are patriotic. Some executives are patriotic.
Argument 3. All cricketers are patriotic. Some executives are soldiers. Some executives are patriotic.
Argument 4. All actors are pretty. Shahrukh is not an actor. Shahrukh is not pretty
In the question below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements :
- All bottles are glasses.
- No cup is a glass.
Conclusions
- No bottle is a cup.
- At least some glasses are bottles.
The question below is given three statements followed by four Conclusions I, II, III, and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- Some dogs are rats.
- All rats are trees.
- Some trees are not dogs.
Conclusions
- Some trees are dogs.
- All dogs are trees.
- All rats are dogs.
- No tree is a dog.
The question contains four arguments of three sentences each. Choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.
Argument 1. No moon is red. All-stars are the moon. All stars are red.
Argument 2. All doors are open. No open is outdoors. All doors are not outdoors.
Argument 3. No Japanese can fire. All Chinese are books. Japanese and Chinese can fight.
Argument 4. No A is B. No B is C. No A is C.
Two statements are given, following by two conclusions numbered I and II . Assuming the statements to be true , even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements: All trees are plants. Some plants are climbers.
Conclusions:
- Some plants are trees.
- Some trees are climbers.
