Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Did the Doctrine of Lapse method have an advantage for the Indian rulers? Why?
Advertisements
उत्तर
No, the Doctrine of Lapse had no advantage for Indian rulers.
Reason:
It was a policy introduced by Lord Dalhousie under which if a ruler died without a natural heir, his kingdom would be annexed by the British. This weakened Indian rulers as they lost their states and power. It only benefited the British by expanding their empire, not the Indian rulers.
संबंधित प्रश्न
Fill in the blank:
Mir Jafar was deposed because he was unable to meet the demands of the __________.
This picture portrays a momentous event in 1765, involving a British Governor and a Mughal emperor wherein the Mughal emperor is conveying the grant of the Diwani to the governor.
Identify the Mughal emperor and the British governor.
In 1765 the British signed treaties with the Nawab of Bengal. Mention any two important terms of this treaty.
Choose the correct answer:
The Maratha chiefs were united under the leadership of ___________ during the First Anglo-Maratha War.
After Hyder Ali’s death, his son Tipu Sultan continued the Anglo-Maratha Wars.
State whether the following is true or false:
The adopted son of Peshwa Baji Rao II was denied the pension that his father used to get from the British.
State whether the following is true or false:
By 1856, the English East India Company had brought the whole of India under its control.
Answer the following question in one or two words/Sentences:
What happened when the administration of a subsidiary state collapsed?
Answer the following question briefly:
Dalhousie was a great expansionist and adopted a number of methods to build an all-India empire. In this context, answer the following question:
Why did Nana Saheb become one of the leaders of the Revolt of 1857?
What was the method adopted by Lord Dalhousie to subjugate the Indian territories?
