Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Consider two ‘postulates’ given below:-
- Given any two distinct points A and B, there exists a third point C which is in between A and B.
- There exist at least three points that are not on the same line.
Do these postulates contain any undefined terms? Are these postulates consistent? Do they follow from Euclid’s postulates? Explain.
Advertisements
उत्तर
Yes, these postulates include undefined terms like 'point and line'. Furthermore, these postulates are consistent because they deal with two distinct situations:
- States that given two points, A and B, a point C exists on the line that connects them. Whereas
- States that given points A and B, you can select a point C that is not on the line that connects them.
No, these postulates are not derived from Euclid's postulates but rather from the axiom, "Given two distinct points, there is a unique line that passes through them."
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
If a point C lies between two points A and B such that AC = BC, point C is called a mid-point of line segment AB. Prove that every line segment has one and only one mid-point.
In Indus Valley Civilisation (about 3000 B.C.), the bricks used for construction work were having dimensions in the ratio ______.
A pyramid is a solid figure, the base of which is ______.
The side faces of a pyramid are ______.
In ancient India, the shapes of altars used for household rituals were ______.
Euclid stated that all right angles are equal to each other in the form of ______.
Solve the following question using appropriate Euclid’s axiom:
In the following figure, we have X and Y are the mid-points of AC and BC and AX = CY. Show that AC = BC.

In the following figure AB = BC, M is the mid-point of AB and N is the mid-point of BC. Show that AM = NC.

Read the following two statements which are taken as axioms:
- If two lines intersect each other, then the vertically opposite angles are not equal.
- If a ray stands on a line, then the sum of two adjacent angles so formed is equal to 180°.
Is this system of axioms consistent? Justify your answer.
Read the following axioms:
- Things which are equal to the same thing are equal to one another.
- If equals are added to equals, the wholes are equal.
- Things which are double of the same thing are equal to one another.
Check whether the given system of axioms is consistent or inconsistent.
