मराठी

AILET entrance exam Question Bank Solutions

Advertisements
[object Object]
[object Object]
विषय
मुख्य विषय
अध्याय

Please select a subject first

Advertisements
Advertisements
< prev  2521 to 2540 of 5721  next > 

Mark the best option:
Principles:

  1. The word animal denotes any living creature, other than a human being.
  2. Whoever with intent to cause, or knowing that he is likely to cause, wrongful loss or damage to the public or to any person, causes the destruction of any property, or any such change in any property or in the situation thereof as destroys or diminishes its value or utility, or affects it injuriously, commits "mischief.
  3. Whoever commits mischief by killing, poisoning, maiming or rendering useless any animals or animal of value, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
  4. Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a law Latin a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.

Facts: Unknown to either Rajat or Kunal, Kunal's pet dog, a pug had entered the section of the lab with the virus on Kunal's last visit to the lab. It was in the section when Rajat broke in and increased the temperature. The pug died due to the heat. Is Rajat liable to punishment under Principle 3 above?

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Mark the best option:
Principle: The standard of care is such a degree of care as a normally skillful member of the medical profession may reasonably be expected to exercise in actual circumstances of the case in question.
Facts: Ms. Roze had difficulty in digesting food. She consulted Dr. Dhingra who after running several tests, recommended surgery for removing bowel obstruction. During the surgery, Dr. Dhingra accidentally left his towel inside Ms. Roze's stomach. Ms.Roze had to suffer grave complications and seizures. Ms. Roze ultimately died a year after her surgery. The autopsy revealed a towel in her stomach. Her heirs decided to sue the doctor for medical negligence. Can they proceed with the suit?

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Advertisements

Mark the best option:
Principles: Whoever has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal shall be punished.
Facts: Two adult men were found engaged in carnal intercourse by the police. The police arrested the men and produced them before the court.

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Given below is the statement of Legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
LEGAL PRINCIPLE: When a person unlawfully intervenes in the chattel of another person by which the latter is deprived of its use, the former commits the tort of conversion. And nobody shall enrich himself at other's cost.
FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a patient suffering from fibroids in her uterus approached KLM Medical Institute. X was suggested to undergo surgery to remove the fibroids from her uterus. The operation was successfully performed and X was discharged after few days. One of the researchers of the KLM institute discovered some rare and unique cells in the fibroids to x and using these cells, the laboratory of KLM developed some life-saving drugs and earned rupees twenty crores from a leading international Pharma Company. When X came to know about it, she claimed five crores from the Institute.
DECISION:

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Apply the legal principles to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
Legal Principle:

  1. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.
  2. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of right-thinking members of society.
  3. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation.
  4. Sometimes a statement may not be defamatory on the face of it but contain an innuendo, which has a defamatory meaning.
  5. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander.
Factual Situation: In May 2017, a memorial commemorating the women of World War II was vandalized during an anti-government demonstration following the General Election. An offensive political slogan was spray-painted across the plinth of the memorial. This act caused public outrage and widespread condemnation. On Twitter, a political writer, Asha Mehta said that she did not have a problem with the vandalism of the memorial building. Chandna reacted to this negatively, suggesting that Asha should be sent to join Terrorist Organization. Asha's comments and Chandna's reactions both received national media coverage. A few days later, Chandna published a tweet asking the question "Scrawled on any war memorials recently?" to Anshika Chauhan, another political activist. Anshika Chauhan responded stating that they had never vandalised any memorial building, and moreover had family members serving in the armed forces. Chandna followed with a second tweet, in which she asked if someone could explain the difference between Mehta (an "irritant") and Anshika Chauhan (whom she described as "social anthrax"). Anshika Chauhan asked for a retra~tion via Twitter and was promptly blocked by Chandna. Anshika Chauhan asked Chandna to make a public apology and claimed compensation for libel alleging that the First Tweet suggested that she had either vandalised a war memorial, which was a criminal act; and the Second Tweet suggested that she approved or condoned that vandalisation. What is the meaning of the Tweets and whether those meanings had defamatory tendency?
[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Mark the best option:
Which judge tried Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination case?

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Mark the best option:
Consider the following statements:

  1. Fast Track Courts are being set up on the recommendation of the 12th Finance Commission.
  2. Fast Track Courts take up Sessions cases pending for two years or more and the cases of undertrials in jails.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

To which one of the following funds are salary and allowances of the Judges of High Court of a State charged?

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Mark the best option:
What cases were MC Mehta vs. Union of India dealing with?

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Mark the best option:
In which case it was held by the Supreme Court that ‘preamble is the basic feature of the constitution’

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Mark the best option:
The Government establishes Gram Nyayalaya for every:

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Mark the best option:
A person can move to the Supreme Court under Article __________ directly in case of his violation of fundamental rights.

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Mark the best option:
A major failure of the judicial system in the country has been its ineffectiveness in ensuring speedy disposal of cases under trial. This is out of line of which among the following articles of Constitution of India which provides a right to speedy justice?

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Given below is the statement of Legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
LEGAL PRINCIPLE: A suit shall be instituted in the court within whose jurisdiction the cause of action arises, or the defendant actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business, or personally works for gain.
FACTUAL SITUATION: 'Y' carries on business in Mumbai. 'Z' carries on business in Delhi. 'Z' buys goods of 'Y' in Mumbai through his agent and request Y to deliver them at Delhi. Accordingly, 'Y' delivered the goods at Delhi. But he did not get the price of the goods delivered in Delhi. Therefore, he intends to move the Civil Court for recovery of the amount from 'Z'. Which court may approach?
DECISION:

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Given below is the statement of Legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.

LEGAL PRINCIPLE: No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law and Civil Courts have coercive powers to compel the attendance of witness only within its local territory.
FACTUAL SITUATION: Puchu, a resident of Faridabad was summoned by the Delhi High Court as a witness in a civil case regarding wrongful possession of immovable property filed by Amu against Kichu. He refused to appear before the court due to his office job. He was prosecuted by the court. ls, he liable?
DECISION:

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Given below is the statement of Legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
LEGAL PRINCIPLE: A judgment which binds only the parties to a suit in which the judgment was passed is called judgment in personam; whereas a judgment which binds all men irrespective of whether they were party to suit or not is known as a judgment in rem.
FACTUAL SITUATION: "Judgment of a competent court determining contractual obligations of the parties to a contract is an example of judgment in personam, but a judgment of a competent court declaring a party to be insolvent is an example of judgment in rem."
Comment on the correctness of this statement.
DECISION:

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Allahabad High Court has held that the ________ of deceased Government employees are eligible for appointment on compassionate ground.

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Which of the following court/tribunal ordered a levy of an environment compensatory charge on commercial vehicles not bound for the capital yet passing through Delhi?

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

ln the following States more than 60% seats are in the reserved category in educational institutions against 50% cap as fixed by the Supreme Court of India

  1. Karnataka
  2. Tamil Nadu
  3. Odisha
  4. Bihar

The correct answer is:

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined

Government of India has decided to establish ____________ in selected High Courts.

[1] Legal Reasoning
Chapter: [1] Legal Reasoning
Concept: undefined >> undefined
< prev  2521 to 2540 of 5721  next > 
Advertisements
Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×