Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Which authority in India notified the guidelines for the protection of persons assisting accident victims on Indian roads based on the Supreme Court's direction?
पर्याय
Ministry of Surface Transport, Govt. of India
Ministry of Social Justice, Govt. of India
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt. of India
National Human Rights Commission
Advertisements
उत्तर
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt. of India
Explanation:
(1)
The Ministry of Surface Transport was a branch of the Government of India. It was the apex body for the formulation and administration of the rules, regulations, and laws relating to surface transport in India
(2)
The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment is a Government of India ministry. It is responsible for welfare, social justice, and empowerment of disadvantaged and marginalised sections of society, including scheduled castes (SC), Other Backward Classes(OBC), the disabled, the elderly, and the victims of drug abuse. The Ministry of Tribal Affairs is responsible for the welfare of scheduled tribes (ST).
(3)
The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways: Sadka Parivahana Va Rajamarga Mantralya), is a ministry of the Government of India, is the apex body for formulation and administration of the rules, regulations, and laws relating to road transport, and transport research, in order to increase the mobility and efficiency of the road transport system in India
(4)
The NHRC is the National Human Rights Commission of India, responsible for the protection and promotion of human rights, defined by the Act as "rights relating to life, liberty, equality, and dignity of the individual guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in the International Covenants". Hence option 'Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt. of India' is the most appropriate statement.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
The age of retirement of a Judge of a High Court in India is
The writ by which a High Court or the Supreme Court can secure the body of a person who has been imprisoned to be brought before it is
The number of writs that can be prayed for and issued by the Supreme Court and/or a High Court is
Examine the Statement and Conclusions given below and choose a suitable answer from the options given:
Statement: A punishment is the imposition of an undesirable or unpleasant outcome upon a group or individual, meted out by an authority.
Conclusions:
1. An eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth is an example of punishment.
2. The imposition of a fine on someone who inflicted bodily injury on another is justified by the statement.
Given below is the statement of Legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
LEGAL PRINCIPLE: A suit shall be instituted in the court within whose jurisdiction the cause of action arises, or the defendant actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business, or personally works for gain.
FACTUAL SITUATION: 'Y' carries on business in Mumbai. 'Z' carries on business in Delhi. 'Z' buys goods of 'Y' in Mumbai through his agent and request Y to deliver them at Delhi. Accordingly, 'Y' delivered the goods at Delhi. But he did not get the price of the goods delivered in Delhi. Therefore, he intends to move the Civil Court for recovery of the amount from 'Z'. Which court may approach?
DECISION:
The following question consists of two statements, one labelled as. 'Assertion' and the other as 'Reason'. Read both the statements carefully and answer using the codes given below.
Assertion (A): An accused person cannot be forced to give his thumb impression.
Reason (R): An accused person cannot be compelled to be a witness against himself.
Who is the first Indian woman to be elected as the Judge of the International Tribunal for the Law of Sea?
The age of consent for sexual intercourse between a husband and wife has been made __________ from ____________ years by the Supreme Court of India.
In March 2018, the Supreme Court of India has held that there cannot be a stay of more than __________ on a trial of _________
Regarding foreign law firms, the Supreme Court held
- That foreign law firms can set up offices in India.
- Foreign lawyers can practice in India.
- Foreign lawyers can visit India for a temporary period on a fly in and fly out basis.
- Foreign lawyers can give advice to their clients on Indian laws.
