Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
What were the poet's thoughts after the snake had gone?
Advertisements
उत्तर
After the snake has gone, the poet regrets at having hit it with a log. He compares his situation with that of the ancient mariner who, after having killed the albatross, wanted it to return. Moreover, he calls the snake a king and feels guilty of having lost the chance of being with "one of the lords of life."
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
What is the poet’s dual attitude towards the snake?
Why did the poet have to wait near the water trough ? (Snake)
Why did the poet try to harm the snake ?
What were the conflicting thoughts in the poet's mind on seeing the snake?
Snakes generate both horror and fascination. Do you agree? Why/Why not?
Answer the following question briefly:
Do you think the snake was conscious of the poet's presence? How do you know?
How do we know that the snake’s thirst had been satiated? Pick out the expressions that convey this.
Answer the following question briefly:
You have already read Coleridge's poem The Ancient Mariner in which an albatross is killed by the mariner. Why does the poet make an allusion to the albatross?
Answer the following question:
In the poem "Snake", why does the poet say "I have something to expatiate."?
Read the given excerpt and answer the questions briefly.
| But must I confess how I liked him, How glad I was he had come like a guest in quiet, to drink at my water-trough And depart peaceful, pacified, and thankless, Into the burning bowels of this earth? |
- What can be inferred about the speaker's attitude towards nature based on the excerpt? (1)
- List the meaning of the phrase "burning bowels of this earth”. (1)
- How is the snake's arrival and departure symbolic? (1)
- The speaker compares the snake to the guest. Which word in the extract displays the snake’s non-guest like behaviour? (1)
