मराठी
महाराष्ट्र राज्य शिक्षण मंडळएचएससी विज्ञान (सामान्य) इयत्ता १२ वी

Using truth table verify that: (p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Using truth table verify that:

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q

तक्ता
Advertisements

उत्तर

p q ∼ q p ∧ q (p ∧ q) ∨ ∼ q p ∨ ∼ q
T T F T T T
T F T F T T
F T F F F F
F F T F T T

∴ (p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q

Hence proved.

shaalaa.com
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2021-2022 (March) Set 1

व्हिडिओ ट्यूटोरियलVIEW ALL [1]

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Write the dual of the following statements:

Madhuri has curly hair and brown eyes.


Write converse and inverse of the following statement: 
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.” 


If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧  ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)


Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q


Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table, verify.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)


Using the truth table, verify

p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)


Using the truth table, verify

~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q.


Using the truth table, verify

~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q


Write the negation of the following statement.

∀ n ∈ N, n + 1 > 0


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

~(p ∨ q) → r


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p → q) ∧ r


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


Write the dual of the following.

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Write the dual of the following.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ r)


Write the dual of the following.

~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q


Choose the correct alternative:

If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a


Write the dual of the following.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country


Examine whether the statement pattern

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.


Complete the truth table.

p q r q → r r → p (q → r) ˅ (r → p)
T T T T `square` T
T T F F `square` `square`
T F T T `square` T
T F F T `square` `square`
F T T `square` F T
F T F `square` T `square`
F F T `square` F T
F F F `square` T `square`

The given statement pattern is a `square`


The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to ______. 


Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×