मराठी
महाराष्ट्र राज्य शिक्षण मंडळएचएससी विज्ञान (सामान्य) इयत्ता १२ वी

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence. p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)

तक्ता
Advertisements

उत्तर

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
p q q → p p → (q → p) ∼ p p → q ∼ p → (p → q)
T T T T F T T
T F T T F F T
F T F T T T T
F F T T T T T

The entries in columns 4 and 7 are identical.
∴ p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)

shaalaa.com
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
पाठ 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.2 [पृष्ठ १३]

APPEARS IN

व्हिडिओ ट्यूटोरियलVIEW ALL [1]

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Write converse and inverse of the following statement: 
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.” 


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )


Show that the following statement pattern in contingency : 

(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)] 


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Write the negation of the following statement : 
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(~ p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p ∧ q) → q


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


Using the truth table, verify

p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)


Using the truth table, verify

~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q


Write the dual of the following:

~(p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p ∨ ~ q


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


Write the negation of the following statement.

∀ n ∈ N, n + 1 > 0


Write the negation of the following statement.

Some continuous functions are differentiable.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)


What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.


Write the dual of the following.

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Write the dual of the following.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ r)


Examine whether the statement pattern

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.


Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.


The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:

(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)


The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×