Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(p → r) ∧ q
Advertisements
उत्तर
~ [(p → r) ∧ q] ≡ ~(p → r) ∨ ~q ....[Negation of conjunction]
≡ (p ∧ ~ r) ∨ ~q .....[Negation of implication]
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”
Show that the following statement pattern in contingency :
(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)]
Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈ N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7
Write the negation of the following statement :
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.
Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)
Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r
(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)
Using the truth table, verify
~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q.
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)
Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.
"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
Write the dual of the following
(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)
Choose the correct alternative:
If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a
Examine whether the statement pattern
[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.
If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively
Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.
