Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Principle: No court can execute the decisions unless it is having territorial jurisdiction over the property or the person against whom a decision is to be executed. The Court which gave the decision can transfer the matter to the court which has the territorial jurisdiction over the person or property.
Facts: A decision is given by the court at New Delhi on a contractual matter against X in a suit between X and Y. X is a resident of Maharashtra and he has properties in Maharashtra and Gujarat.
पर्याय
New Delhi court can transfer the proceedings to Court at Maharashtra only
New Delhi court can execute the decision because it had the jurisdiction to decide the matter so it can execute also
New Delhi court can transfer the proceedings to court at Gujarat only
New Delhi court can transfer the proceedings to either of the courts i.e. Maharasthra or Gujarat
Advertisements
उत्तर
New Delhi court can transfer the proceedings to either of the courts i.e. Maharasthra or Gujarat
Explanation:
New Delhi court can transfer the proceedings to either of the courts i.e. Maharashtra or Gujarat. This is according to the principle that the Court which gave the decision can transfer the matter to the court which has the territorial jurisdiction over the person or property.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Mark the best option:
The Constitutional Amendment that sought to dilute the right to property from the status of the fundamental right to that of a legal right in India is:
In which Constitutional Amendment Act seats of Lok Sabha were increased from 525 to 545?
The Concept of Judicial Review is our Constitution has taken from
Which of the following means 'to be certified'?
Which one of the following statements regarding the Vice-President of India officiating as President is correct?
Who among the following decides the salaries and allowances of Member of Parliament?
Who is the Chief Justice of India presently?
In the question given below are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R). In the context of the two statements, which of the following is correct?
Assertion (A): United judiciary is the function of unitary feature.
Reason (R): USA judiciary is the example of strong federation.
The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act was passed by the Parliament in the year
The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.
Principle: Whosoever commits any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code with a view to obtaining the consent of any person to enter into an agreement, he cannot get the agreement enforced by law but the person, whose consent has been so obtained may get the agreement enforced by law. The Indian Panel Code defines various offenses and prescribes punishments therefor.
Facts: A obtains the consent of B to enter into an agreement by an act amounting to criminal intimidation under the Indian Panel Code. A brings a case against B for a performance of agreement.
