Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
The question consists of two statements, one labelled as a principle and other as Fact. You are to exa.mine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.
PRINCIPAL: ignorantia juris nonexcusat and ingnorantia facit excusat
FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Etombay on 28th Nov. 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the 'Manifest for transfer. On 28th Nov. 1962 Govemment of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that the gold must be declared in the "Manifest" of the aircraft.
पर्याय
George cannot be prosecuted because he had actually no knowledge about the new notification issued only two days ago.
George cannot be prosecuted because it is mistake of fact which is excusable
George's will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.
George liability would depend on the discretion of the court.
Advertisements
उत्तर
George's will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
In a particular case, the advice tendered by the Council of Ministers is sent back by the President for reconsideration. If the Council of Ministers adhere to their earlier advice, the President
The question consists of two statements, one labelled as principle and other as Fact. You are to exa.mine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.
PRINCIPLE: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, 0( some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding Situation.
FACT: jeevan and Pavan were neighbors in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.
The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and other as Reason (R).
You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option.
Assertion: Custom per se is law, independent of prior recognition by the sovereign or the judge.
Reason: Custom is source of Jaw but by itself is not law.
The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and other as Reason (R).
You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option.
Assertion: Laws are means of achieving an end namely social control.
Reason: The ultimate end of law is to secure greatest happiness to greatest number.
Read the definition and elements of the attempt, apply them on the given fact situations and answer the question:
Definition of Attempt: Lord Blackburn has said that "there is no doubt that there is difference between a preparation antecedent to an attempt and the actual attempt, but if the actual transaction has commenced which would have ended in the crime if not interrupted, there is clearly an attempt to commit the crime."
1. Fault element· Intention or knowledge requisite for committing an offense: and
2. Conduct Element: does any act towards its commission and has crossed the stage of preparation. This act is so closely connected with and proximate to the commission that it falls in object because of facts not known to him or because of circumstances beyond his control.
'RANI' ran to a well stating that she would jump into it. and she started running towards the well but she was caught before she could reach it.
What is a moot'?
The temporary release of a convicted prisoner from jail for a fixed period is called -
Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:
Animus posssidendi’ means:
Mark the best option:
A nominal sum is given as a token, that the parties are eager about concluding the sale is called
In ‘quid-pro-quo’, quo stands for
