Advertisements
Advertisements
рдкреНрд░рд╢реНрди
In an A.P., prove that: `T_(m + n ) + T_(m - n) = 2.T_m`
рд╕рд┐рджреНрдзрд╛рдВрдд
Advertisements
рдЙрддреНрддрд░
Let a be the first term and d be the common difference. We define the three terms mentioned:
1. `T_(m + n): a + (m + n − 1)d`
2. `T_(m − n): a + (m − n − 1)d`
3. Tm: a + (m − 1)d
Add the terms on the Left Hand Side (LHS):
LHS = `T_(m + n) + T_(m − n)`
LHS = [a + (m + n − 1)d] + [a + (m − n − 1)d]
LHS = 2a + (m + n − 1 + m − n − 1)d
LHS = 2ЁЭСО + (2ЁЭСЪ − 2)ЁЭСС
Factor out a 2 from the terms in the bracket
LHS = 2ЁЭСО + 2(ЁЭСЪ − 1)ЁЭСС
LHS = 2[ЁЭСО + (ЁЭСЪ − 1)d]
a + (m − 1)d = TmтАЛ
LHS = RHS
`T_(m + n ) + T_(m - n) = 2.T_m`
Hence Proved. This property shows that in an A.P., the sum of terms equidistant from Tm is twice the value of Tm.
shaalaa.com
рдпрд╛ рдкреНрд░рд╢реНрдирд╛рдд рдХрд┐рдВрд╡рд╛ рдЙрддреНрддрд░рд╛рдд рдХрд╛рд╣реА рддреНрд░реБрдЯреА рдЖрд╣реЗ рдХрд╛?
