Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
How many languages are there in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India?
पर्याय
21
22
19
18
Advertisements
उत्तर
21
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Under which Government of India Act, Federation, and Provincial Autonomy were introduced in India?
Which of the following consisting in Part IV A of the Constitution?
The 97th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2011 added a new part to the Constitution. Which of the following is that part?
Which of the following state was formed by taking the Naga Hills and Tuensang area out of the state of Asom?
A person of India origin who is ordinarily resident in India for seven years before making
is eligible for
Which of the following serve as a guide, philosopher and friend in its legislative and executive acts to ruling party?
Who among the following presides over the joint sitting of the Parliament?
Who can remove the members of the Union Public Service Commission by issuing an order under the circumstances provided by the Constitution?
Which of the following matters should be only decided by the state assembly of Nagaland?
Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
Factual Situation: In order to ensure that people live in an amicable atmosphere the Government of India decided to abolish courts and constituted Dispute Settlement Boards. Further to achieve this objective, the law stipulated that lawyers should not be allowed to espouse the claims of parties, and instead their claims be espoused by social workers.
Legal Principles:
I. Any law made by the Parliament that infringes the fundamental rights of the citizens is invalid and unenforceable.
II. Freedom to carry on trade or profession of one’s own choice is a fundamental right.
III. The Parliament is competent to impose reasonable restrictions on the exercise of this right.
IV. If the restrictions, on fundamental rights imposed by the Parliament, totally removes or nullifies any fundamental right then it will be construed as an unreasonable restriction. Decision:
