Question

FACTS 'A' was known to have violent tendencies to got drunk and was forced to get such by 'B'. When 'A' got drunk and tried to attack 'B', 'B' injured 'A' in using as much force as was proportional and only to the extent necessary to stop 'A' from injuring 'B'.

पर्याय

• B's action is protected as it was proportional to the harm

• B's action was protected as it was inflicted to the extent necessary

• B's action is not protected as 'A' was drunk · and therefore not in control of his actions

• B's action is not protected as it was not done in good faith

Answer 1

B's action was protected as it was inflicted to the extent necessary