मराठी

Direction: Read the Following Carefully and Answer the Question Given Below Although Women Now Constitute 30 Percent of the Global Industrial Force, Legal Hurdles - Mathematics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Direction: Read the following carefully and answer the question given below

Although women now constitute 30 percent of the global industrial force, legal hurdles and traditional barriers still hinder the vast majority of women in their efforts to achieve parity with men.

The paragraph best supports the statement

पर्याय

  • The author claims that Feminism rules.

  • The equality of men and women is still a myth.

  • Women should surpass men in all fields.

  • The author claims that women have to take more effort.

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

The equality of men and women is still a myth.

shaalaa.com
Indian Constitution (Entrance Exams)
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2017-2018 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

There is no provision in the Constitution for the impeachment of 


The principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option:

Principle: The Constitution of India guarantees certain fundamental rights to its citizens. The Constitution also provides that these rights cannot be taken away by state even by law. For violation of this, the person adversely affected by the law may approach the High Court or the Supreme Court for the issuance of an appropriate writ. One of these rights includes the freedom to form association that implies the right to join an association or not to joins such an association.

Facts: Owing to some industrial disturbances created by XATU, one of the several trade unions in AB Chemicals (Pvt) Ltd., the Company issued a circular to all its employees that as far as possible the employees may disassociate with XATU. Navin is an employee of AB Chemicals and the current General Secretary of XATU. Aggrieved by this circular, which affected the fundamental rights of his and other members of the Union, approaches the High Court of the state for relief. Identify the most reasonable legal proposition.


Mark the best option:
Principles:

  1. The Constitution of India has divided the power to make laws between the Central and State Legislatures by mentioning the subjects for legislation under the Union (under Central Government), State (under State Government) and Concurrent List(under both Central and State Governments) under the Seventh Schedule.
  2. When the Central or State Legislatures exceed the subjects in their respective lists, the law so made is considered ultra vires the Constitution and has no effect.
  3. A subsequent retrospective amendment of the Constitution widening the scope of legislation of the said legislature cannot validate such ultra vires legislation.
  4. A fresh law enacted by the said Legislature post such an amendment of the Constitution is considered valid.
  5. A Legislature in exercise of its valid legislative power may extend to its territory a law made by another Legislature.

Facts: In light of the growing economic development in the state of Gujarat, the state legislature passed a law on 26th December 2012 setting up Gujarat State Railways Corporation to ply goods trains between commercial areas within Gujarat. The law faced criticism since railways formed an entry under the Union List in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. The Gujarat legislature stood by the legislation owing to the 118th Constitutional Amendment of 28th December 2012 shifting only commercial railways to the Concurrent List.

Post the Constitutional Amendment, laws in relation to passenger railways can be made by:


Which article is related to "Equal Justice and free legal aid"?


When did the Constituent Assembly passed a resolution for translation of the Constitution of India into Hindi and other many languages of India?


Which of the following countries have no right to acquire the Overseas Citizen of India by the persons of Indian origin?


Money bill can be introduced in the Parliament only with the prior recommendation of whom?


Who can remove the members of the Union Public Service Commission by issuing an order under the circumstances provided by the Constitution?


The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.

Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offense, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offense.

Facts: A intentionally omitted to give food to his father. He also used to beat his father. Consequently, A's father died.


Principle: The Constitution of India guarantees the 'right to life', which means 'right to live with human dignity'. The right to life under the constitution, however, does not include the right to die.

Facts: 'M' who is 90, lives all alone as he has no family or children or grandchildren. He suffers from physical and mental distress, as there is no one to look after him. He has little means to foot his medical expenses. Under these circumstances, he approaches the court with a prayer that he should be granted the right to die with dignity because he does not want to be a burden on society. Further, as it is his life, he has a right to put an end to it.
Which of the following derivations is correct?


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×