Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and other as Reason (R).
You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option.
Assertion: We the people of India. having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Democratic Republic.
Reason: A republic will ensure we have a head of state that is democratically elected and accountable to voters. As a result, the head of state will be a more effective constitutional safeguard.
पर्याय
Both A and R are individually true and R is correct explanation to A
Both A and R are individually true but R is not correct explanation of A
A is true but R is false
A is false but R is true
Advertisements
उत्तर
Both A and R are individually true and R is correct explanation to A
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Who appoints the judges of the Supreme Court?
Which of the following Article states that India as a Union of States rather than a Federation of States?
Which of the following Article states that Sikkim to be associated with the Union which is repealed?
The boundary of a state in India can be altered through the procedure laid down in the Article.
The Fundamental Rights to the Constitution are inspired from which of the following Constitution of the world?
Which of the following Articles contain provisions regarding panchayats?
Which article provides special provisions to the state of Nagaland?
Which of the following is not a fundamental right in India?
Ms. Usha wants to file a suit against Bhagyalaxmi Theatre praying for a permanent injunction (stay order) restraining the theatre from running the film named “Jai Santoshi Maa”. Her contention is that the film hurt her religious feelings and sentiments as Goddess Saraswati, Laxmi and Parvati were depicted as jealous and were ridiculed.
Principle: Whenever there is an invasion of a legal right, the person in whom the right is vested, is entitled to bring an action though he has suffered no actual loss or harm and may recover damages (compensation).
Facts: 'A’ was a qualified voter for the Lok Sabha election. However, a returning officer wrongfully refused to take A's vote. Inspite of such wrongful refusal, the candidate, for whom 'A' wanted to vote, won the election. But, 'A' brought an action for damages. Which of the following derivations is correct?
