AILET entrance exam Question Bank Solutions

In the question given below are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R). In the context of the two statements, which of the following is correct?

Assertion (A) Law is the social mediator of society.

Reason (R) In a complex society, conflict is bound to create.

In the question given below are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R). In the context of the two statements, which of the following is correct?

Assertion (A) Divine law is always related to God.

Reason (R) Man in the state of society is governed by the divine law of God in ancient society.

In the question given below are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R). In the context of the two statements, which of the following is correct?

Assertion (A) The source of law is traced from judicial pronouncement.

Reason (R) It ensures that previous courts decision is followed by another court.

International law is the law between sovereign states. A sovereign is a supreme authority not bound by legal constraints

The Father of International law is

The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 helps in

The criminal procedure code is of

Actus rtus means

A person with an innocent mind

Ignorance of the law is

Homicide means killing of a human being by

Unlawful homicide includes

Extortion is almost equal to the offence of

Theft is defined only for

If the things removed temporarily with dishonest intention amount to

PRINCIPLE The right of private defence entitles one to do harm to a proportional extent provided it is done in good faith, it is proportional and is inflicted only to the extent is necessary to stop a person from committing harm against oneself.

FACTS A doctor with the intention of saving a terminal patient's life decides to administer an experimental drug to the patient without informing the patient or taking consent from the patient's relatives leading to the patient's death.

FACTS 'A' was known to have violent tendencies to got drunk and was forced to get such by 'B'. When 'A' got drunk and tried to attack 'B', 'B' injured 'A' in using as much force as was proportional and only to the extent necessary to stop 'A' from injuring 'B'.

PRINCIPLE Whoever causes the death of any person by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide, shall be liable for causing death by negligence.

FACTS A nurse knowing that she is supposed to take vitals and ensure them to be in order before administering a particular injection, but not knowing or having reason to believe it is fatal does not follow the protocol in hurry. As a result, the patient died.

PRINCIPLE No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence twice.

FACTUAL SITUATION 'A', a kleptomaniac, was an acquaintance of 'B' and used to visit 'B's home on weekends. One day. 'B' was unable to find his watch after a visit from 'A'. Ultimately.'B' informed the police about the missing watch and the persons who had been to his room. The police, among others, made a search on a person of 'A' and found the watch in his pocket. At his trial, the Court found him guilty of theft and sentenced him to 3 months in prison. After completing his sentence, 'A' went to 'B's' home to apologise for his conduct. After 'A' left, it was discovered that 'B's' watch was missing. 'A' informed the police who located the watch from 'A's home. Can 'A' be prosecuted for theft?

PRINCIPLE Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law: provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered to him without his knowledge or against his will.

FACTUAL SITUATION 'A' was having a get together with his old friends and on his friend's suggestions, he consumed some alcohol. On his way back home at, night, 'A' heard some footsteps and turning back, he imagined he saw a figure moving towards him with a spear. In fact, it was only a man, 'B' with an umbrella. who was telling 'A' to walk carefully since 'A' appeared to be unsteady?

However, 'A' proceeded to attack 'B' with an iron rod leading to grave injuries to 'B', Is 'A' guilty of causing grievous hurt to 'B'?