AILET entrance exam Question Bank Solutions

Which of the following is not an element of an intentional tort?

What main element differentiates the crime of battery from the tort of battery?

What is the essential difference that makes the crime of assault differ from the tort of assault?

Which of the following is an example of trespass?

A loud bass beat that can be heard through an apartment wall (from another apartment) at midnight can be classified as

Why is defamation a tort?

Defamation involves:

Negligence involves:

This tort occurs most often in society.

Which one of the following interests are not protected by the law of tort?

What the Injuries Board is...

Which of the following is not a defense to trespass to the person?

The following is not a tort described as ‘trespass to the person...

What is the Compensation Act 2006 s 1 has what purpose...

Which of the following is not an objective of the law of tort?

Which one of the following groups are required by law to be insured?

Which Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects which right...?

What are the remedies provided by the Human Rights Act 1998 are intended to regulate the activities of whom...

The Law of the contract is different from the law of tort in which way...?

Given below is the statement of Legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
LEGAL PRINCIPLE: ln the employer-employee relationship, the employer is held liable for all the wrongs committed by his employees in the course of employment.
FACTUAL SITUATION: David was employed as a Driver in ABC & Co over the past 15 years and has been appreciated by the General Manager for his hard work and sincerity. He has been rewarded by the company for his accident-free record. David's younger brother wanted to join the same company as a driver. He obtained a Learner's Licence, joined a Driving School and was learning driving during the last three months. He was on the verge of completion of the training and appear for the Driving test. He wanted to have more practice before the test and requested his brother David for using the Company's car for two days. David also allowed him to use the office car for the practice. While he was practicing driving, a truck came from the wrong side, hit the company's car driven by David's brother, which in turn hit a pedestrian and injured him. The pedestrian sues the company for damages.
DECISION: