Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∨ (p → r)
Advertisements
उत्तर
Step 1: Expressing Implications in Terms of Logical Operators
p → q ≡ ∼p ∨ q
p → r ≡ ∼p ∨ r
(p → q) ∨ (p → r)
(∼p ∨ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ r)
Using the associative and distributive properties of logical operators:
∼p ∨ (q ∨ r)
Step 2: Negation of the Statement
∼[∼p ∨ (q ∨ r)]
Using De Morgan’s Theorem:
∼(∼p) ∧ ∼(q ∨ r)
p ∧ (∼q ∧ ∼r)
p ∧ ∼q ∧ ∼r
Step 3: Interpretation
The negation of the given statement means:
- p is true.
- q is false.
- r is false.
Thus, the negation of (p → q) ∨ (p → r) is:
p ∧ ∼ q ∧ ∼r
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T
Write the negation of the following statement :
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.
State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
~ p → (p → ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(p ∧ q) → q
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)
Fill in the blanks :
Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.
Using the truth table, verify.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Using the truth table, verify
~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q.
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q
Write the dual of the following:
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(p → r) ∧ q
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
(p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ~(p ∧ q)
Examine whether the statement pattern
[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)
The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.
The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.
In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .
- `bar(PR)`
- `bar(PM)`
- `bar(QM)`
If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].
