हिंदी

Which of the Following Statements is the Most Appropriate in Relation to the Legal Principle Stated Above? - Mathematics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer. 

Legal Principle: Every partner is liable alone and jointly with other partners for the debts of a partnership firm incurred for the business. Every partner is an agent of every other partner while being a principal in his own right in the business of the partnership. 
Fact Situation: Varun is a partner in a firm with Chinmoy and Jaffar. Jaffar purchases a car for his personal purpose and obtains credit for the same in the name of the partnership behind the back of the other partners. He fails to pay the due amount on the expiry of the period of credit.

Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?

विकल्प

  • Varun, Chinmoy, and Jaffar are liable to pay for the car since they are partners and the credit was obtained in the name of the firm. 

  • Varun and Chinmoy are not liable to pay for the car since Jaffar purchased it for his personal purpose. 

  • Varun, Chinmoy, and Jaffar are liable as partners for all credit obtained in the name of the firm even if it is for the personal purpose of a partner. 

  • Jaffar can use the credit of the firm to make purchases even for personal purposes since he is a  partner in the partnership.

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

Varun and Chinmoy are not liable to pay for the car since Jaffar purchased it for his personal purpose. 

Explanation:

Every partner is an agent of the firm and his other partners for the purpose of the business of the partnership, and the acts of every partner who does any act for carrying on in the usual way business of the kind carried on by the firm of which he is a member bind the firm and his partners unless the partner so acting has in fact no authority to act for the firm in the particular matter, and the person with whom he is dealing either knows that he has no authority or does not know or believe him to be a partner. In the light of the given legal principle and explanation provided above it is clear that Jaffer purchased the car for his personal use and obtained credit for it acting outside his authority behind the back of other partners, he was not acting as an agent of the company or as the partner to Varun and Chinmoy but was acting on behalf of himself and for a personal motive. Hence other two partners are not liable to pay. leading option (2) is the most appropriate statement

shaalaa.com
Contract Law
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2017-2018 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्न

Principle: The communication of a proposal is complete when it comes to the knowledge of the person to whom it is made.

Facts: 'A‘ sent a letter making a proposal to 'B‘ to purchase the house of B.  


How many members are required to support the introduction of a No-Confidence Motion in the Lok Sabha?


Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer.  

Principle: Where both parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to the matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is void.

Factual Situation: A had a piece of land. He believed that the value of the land was 1,000 per square foot. B knew that the value of the land was infact 1,500 per square foot. However, he did not inform A and purchased the land at 1,000.


Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer.

Principle: A second suit will not be heard on the same facts between the same parties.

Nakshatra files a suit against Chandra for getting possession of a house on the ground that the property passed on to her through the will executed by Surya before his death. The suit gets dismissed as Nakshatra fails to produce the will. Nakshatra files another suit against Chandra to get the same house from the latter, on the ground that she was entitled to the house as being the nearest heir of Surya.


Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer.

Principle: A contingent contract is a contract to do or not to do something, if some event, collateral to such contract, does or does not happen.

Facts: A agrees to pay B a sum of Rs. 1 lakh if B marries C within a period of six months. B marries C during the seventh month as the marriage hall was available only during that month. B claims Rs. 1 lakh from A.


Principle: Contract is an agreement entered into between the parties. 

Factual Situation: Ramlal was a dealer in cement. The Government of India, by an order issued under the Essential Commodities Act, fixed the price of cement and also, the quantity which a person can buy from the dealer, Ramlal carried on his business under this new order for some time, but he refused to pay sales tax on his sales transactions on the ground that these were not the contracts freely entered into by him.

Decision


Study the following information  and answer the question that follows:

Principle: A 'fixture' is something attached to the land or a building in such a way that it is regarded as an irremovable part of the property you are considering buying. Some typical 'fixtures' in a home include the hot water service, range top, wall oven, fixed floor coverings, light fittings, and a built-in (under bench) dishwasher. Garden plants, including bushes and trees, are also 'fixtures'.

Rule A. When land is sold, all 'fixtures' on the land are also deemed to have been sold.

Rule B. If a movable thing is attached to the land or any building on the land, then it becomes a 'fixture'.

Factual Situation Khaleeda wants to sell a plot of land she owns in Beghmara (Meghalaya) and the sale value decided for the plot includes the fully-furnished palatial six-bedroom house that she has built on it five years ago. She sells it to Gurpreet for 60 lakh. After completing the sale, she removes the expensive Iranian carpet which used to cover the entire wooden floor of one of the bedrooms. The room had very little light and Khaleeda used this light-coloured radiant carpet to negate some of the darkness in the room. Gurpreet, after moving in, realises this and files a case to recover the carpet from Khaleeda.
Assume that in the above fact scenario, Khaleeda no longer wants the carpet. She removes the elaborately carved door to the house after the sale has been concluded and claims that Gurpreet has no claim to the door. The door in question was part of Khaleeda's ancestral home in Nagercoil (Tamil Nadu) for more than 150 years before she had it fitted as the entrance to her Beghmara house.

As a judge you would decide in favour of 


Study the following information and answer the questions that follow:

Principle: A 'fixture' is something attached to the land or a building in such a way that it is regarded as an irremovable part of the property you are considering buying. Some typical 'fixtures' in a home include the hot water service, range top, wall oven, fixed floor coverings, light fittings, and a built-in (under bench) dishwasher. Garden plants, including bushes and trees, are also 'fixtures'.
Rule A. When land is sold, all 'fixtures' on the land are also deemed to have been sold.
Rule B. If a movable thing is attached to the land or any building on the land than it becomes a 'fixture'.
Factual Situation 1: Khaleeda wants to sell a plot of land she owns in Beghmara (Meghalaya) and the sale value decided for the plot includes the fully-furnished palatial six-bedroom house that she has built on it five years ago. She sells it to Gurpreet for 60 lakh. After completing the sale, she removes the expensive Iranian carpet which used to cover the entire wooden floor of one of the bedrooms. The room had very little light and Khaleeda used this light-colored radiant carpet to negate some of the darkness in the room. Gurpreet, after moving in, realizes this and files a case to recover the carpet from Khaleeda.

Situation 2:
Assume that in the above fact scenario, Khaleeda no longer wants the carpet. She removes the elaborately carved door to the house after the sale has been concluded and claims that Gurpreet has no claim to the door. The door in question was part of Khaleeda's ancestral home in Nagercoil (Tamil Nadu) for more than 150 years before she had it fitted as the entrance to her Beghmara house.

Rule C If a moveable thing is placed on land with the intention that it should become an integral part of the land or any structure on the land, it becomes a fixture. Applying  Rules A and C, to the fact situations in questions Situation 1 and Situation 2,  as a judge you would decide in favour of  


LEGAL PRINCIPLE: A contract that is impossible to perform becomes void.

FACTUAL SITUATION: Surender agreed to deliver a specific quality of rice to Sonakshi identified by both of them. Before delivery, the rice was burnt by a short circuit. Is Surender discharged from the performance of the contract?

DECISION:


Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer. 

Legal Principle:
1. Negligence is the absence of care on the part of one party which results in some damage to the other Party.
2. Generally, a person is under no duty to control another to prevent his doing damage to a third party.
3. The foreseeability test basically asks whether the person causing the injury should have reasonably foreseen the general consequences that would result because of his or her conduct.  
4. Statutory authority implies that an act is done by a  person to fulfill his duty imposed by the State.  Statutory authority is a valid defence under the law of torts.

Factual Situation: Ten borstal trainees were working on an island in a harbour in the custody and under the control of three officers. During the night, seven of them escaped. It was claimed that at the time of the escape the officer's lad retired to bed. The seven got on board a yacht, moored off the island and set it in motion. They collided with another yacht, the property of X and damaged it. X sued the Home office for the amount of the damage. Decide whether, on the facts pleaded in the statement of claim the Home Office, its servants or agents owed any duty of care to X capable of giving rise to a liability in damages with respect to the detention of persons undergoing sentences of borstal training or with respect to the manner in which such persons were treated, employed, disciplined, controlled or supervised whilst undergoing such sentences.

Decision:


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×