हिंदी

The Railway Authorities Negligently Allowed a Train to Be Overcrowded. in Consequence, a Legitimate Passenger Mr. X Got His Pocket Picked. Choose the Appropriate Answer.

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

The railway authorities negligently allowed a train to be overcrowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose the appropriate answer.

विकल्प

  • Mr. X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered

  • Mr. X ran sue because he had given consent to travel in an overcrowded train

  • Mr. X cannot sue railway authorities because there was no infringement of his legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give rise to a cause of action

  • None of the above

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

Mr. X cannot sue railway authorities because there was no infringement of his legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give rise to a cause of action

shaalaa.com
Law of Torts (Entrance Exams)
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2014-2015 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्न

Principle: Law does not penalise for wrongs which are of trivial nature.

Facts: In the course of a discussion, 'A' threw a file of papers at the table which touched the hands of 'B'.


Mark the best option:
Fact: Ganesh had a ferocious dog as his pet. The dog used to terrorize people in the neighborhood by attacking the pet animals. One day the dog started attacking Bipasha’s cat on the road and followed the cat into Bipasha’s house and continued attacking her cat. Her cat was seriously wounded and was bleeding. Bipasha made several attempts to chase the dog away but it was of no use, so she got hold of a kitchen knife and inflicted a severe wound on the dog’s body. After this, the dog ran off. The dog subsequently died because of the wound. Ganesh sued Bipasha for damages saying that she should have called him for help.
Principle:

  1. Every person has a right to defend his own person, property or possession against unlawful harm.
  2. The person may use reasonable force in order to protect his person, property or possession
  3. However, the force employed should be proportionate to the apprehended danger.

Who is an Ombudsman?


The law relating to prisoners of war has been codified by


Which of the following is not a reason for the general lack of liability for omissions in English law?


Why is defamation a tort?


Injuria sine damnum stands for.


Public nuisance include


PRINCIPLE The use of force with the intent to cause harm, or annoy or induce· fear is termed as the Torts of battery.

FACTS A group of construction workers was negligently handling bricks bycatch and throw. Simmons was passing by the site where one such brick fell on Simmons and he brought a case of battery against the contractor under whose employment the workmen were carrying out the construction.


Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.

Legal Principles:

1. Joint tort-feasters means joint wrongdoers. People can be joint tortfeasors in case of common action in fact or in law.

2. Joint tort-feasters are jointly and severally liable.

Factual situation: Two dogs belonging to two different owners acting in concert attacked a flock of sheep and injured several sheep. In an action for damages brought against the owners of the dogs. If one of them puts a defene claiming that he was liable for one half only of the damage, then which one of the following statements is legally sustainable in the above case? DECISION:


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×