हिंदी

Principle: Copyright Law Protects Only Work. 'Work' Means Cinematographic Film but Does Not Include Performance by an Actor in a Cinematographic Film.

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Principle: Copyright law protects only work. 'Work' means cinematographic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cinematographic film.

Facts: Alia Bhatt acted in a movie.

विकल्प

  • The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producer's work.

  • The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional work.

  • The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright law.

  • The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic work.

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional work.

Explanation:

The reasonable conclusion is drawn that the acting of  Alia Bhatt is protected under copyright law. The copyright shall subsist until sixty years from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the film is published.   

shaalaa.com
Law of Torts (Entrance Exams)
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2015-2016 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्न

Principle: One who asserts must prove.

Facts:  A desires a Court to give judgment that B, C, and D shall be punished for a crime which A says B, C, and D have committed. 


Principle: Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under twelve years of age, who has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequences of his conduct on that occasion.

Facts: Himesh, 11 years old boy, picks up a gold ring worth Rs 5000/-­ lying on a table in his friend's house and immediately sells it for Rs 2000/­, and misappropriates the money.


Mark the best option:
Principle: A person, who provides his services to another, needs to be paid for the same. In case he is not paid, he needs to become compensated by the person who availed his services.
Facts: Jack went to the restaurant to have dinner. After having a good meal he realized he didn't have enough money to pay for the bill. He told the manager of the restaurant about the problem. The manager asked him to give his watch and his Parker pen in lieu of the money for the bill. Is Jack liable to give his watch and pen instead of the money?


PRINCIPLE Trespass is the unauthorized entry through the person or tangible object into the property of another. The rights of property exist on the surface, aerially and in the subterrain.

FACTS Kumari and Shravan lived in houses interspersed by the plot of Shantanu. Kumari and Shravan set-up a walkie talkie connection by setting up their transmitte~s facing each other. When Shantanu came to know about the arrangement, he filed a suit of trespass stating that the same was a case of trespass as signals could reach each other only by crossing his plot.


Suit and nuisance are


Negligence means


Principle: A Master is liable to third persons for every such wrong of his servant as committed in the course of service. For acts committed beyond the scope of employment, the master is liable only if he has expressly authorised the act.

A owned a bus and he had hired B to drive it and C to be the conductor. One day, when B had stepped out of the bus to have a cup of coffee. C decided to turn the bus around so that it was ready for its next trip. While doing so, C ran over D's leg, causing major injuries to him. D sued A for damages.


Principle: Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

Facts: A fails to file his income tat returns for ten years. The Income-tax department issues to him notice to show cause why proceedings should not be initiated against him for the recovery of the income tax due from him with interest and penalty. Advise.


Principle: A person who commits an unlawful act towards another which can be imputed to him, must repair the damage which the other person suffers as a consequence thereof.

Facts: Mr. Rajender Singh was riding his scooter on the right side of the road which is illegal as per the Traffic Rules. Mr. Rajesh Chawla was driving his car in the opposite direction. The two vehicles collided and resulted in loss of Rs. 50,000/- to Mr. Rajender Singh. This includes his medical expenses and damage to the scooter. In this accident, there is no fault on the part of Mr. Rajesh Chawla.


LEGAL PRINCIPLE: 
1. Medical professionals are not immune from liability in tort on the ground of negligence.  
2. Services rendered to a patient by a doctor (except when given free of charge) by way of consultation, diagnosis and treatment fall in the definition of "service" under the Consumer Protection Act, in case of negligence,  the doctors are liable in tort as well as under the  Consumer Protection Act.  

FACTUAL SITUATION: A was the only child of his parents.  Once he had a high fever and his parents called a doctor at home. This doctor used to work at a respectable hospital in  Delhi. The doctor administered certain medicines and asked the nurse to stay with him for the night and administer to him a chloroquine injection. This injection was generally not suitable for young children. The nurse, without a prior test, followed instructions of the doctor and gave the injection. As a result of an allergic reaction, the child died.  The parents sued the nurse and the doctor.  DECISION: 


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×